Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 7;8(6):e1002740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002740

Figure 7. Effect of interference among alleles with a distribution of selective advantages.

Figure 7

Simulation results for scaled mean probability of fixation Inline graphic for mutations with exponentially distributed selective advantages (blue circles) and scaled mean selective advantage for successful mutations Inline graphic (green diamonds), as a function of the baseline density of sweeps Inline graphic – i.e., the amount of interference. The purple squares shows Inline graphic for the same parameter values, but with all mutations conferring an identical selective advantage Inline graphic. Allowing for a distribution of selective effects makes little difference in the rate of sweeps, Inline graphic, and the mean selective advantage of sweeps stays close to Inline graphic (dashed black line), even for strong interference. The theoretical predictions Eqs. (7) and (13) (purple and blue dashed curves, respectively) are accurate for weak interference, but underestimate fixation probability with strong interference. The mutation rate Inline graphic is varied, with other parameters held constant at Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and mean selective advantage provided by a mutation Inline graphic. All points are averages over 5000 simulated generations. Error bars on the top curve show the standard deviation of Inline graphic for successful mutations. The standard errors are less than the size of the points.