Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health Dent. 2012 Feb 24;72(2):164–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00306.x

Table 2.

Adolescents’ and Parents’ Esthetic Perceptions by Maxillary Incisor/Canine Fluorosis Status (N=376)

Adolescent Responses Parent Responses

Item Response Total
%
Adolescent
Fluorosis Status
P-Value* Total
%
Adolescent
Fluorosis Status
P-Value**
%No
(n=278)
%Yes
(n=98)
%No
(n=278)
%Yes
(n=98)
Overall
appearance
Very satisfied 22 24 14 0.15 39 43 30 0.014
Somewhat satisfied 63 60 70 46 45 48
Somewhat dissatisfied 12 13 11 11 8 20
Very dissatisfied 3 3 4 3 4 2

Concerns††
Shape Yes 19 20 19 0.89 12 10 15 0.21
Color Yes 45 45 44 0.82 43 38 55 0.005
Alignment Yes 35 34 38 0.47 37 35 43 0.15
Spacing Yes 18 16 22 0.17 15 16 14 0.87
Crowding Yes 26 24 32 0.14 23 23 20 0.58
Color
irregularities
Yes 27 27 29 0.70 22 15 42 <0.001
Other Yes 3 4 0 0.042 5 4 7 0.16

Overall
color
Very satisfied 24 27 18 0.52 34 37 24 <0.001
Somewhat satisfied 58 55 65 52 52 51
Somewhat dissatisfied 15 15 14 13 10 22
Very dissatisfied 3 3 2 1 1 2

P-value from Cochran-Armitage Trend Test.

††

P-value from Fisher’s Exact Test.

*

P-values show comparison of adolescents’ esthetic perceptions by their fluorosis status.

**

P-values show comparison of parents’ esthetic perceptions by their adolescents’ fluorosis status.