Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 28;73(3):467–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04103.x

Table 4.

Statistical comparison of ARS and DHA pharmacokinetics in mildly and moderately unwell pregnant women with uncomplicated malaria

(a) i.v. administration
ARS DHA
Mildly unwell (n = 7) Moderately unwell (n = 13) P value Mildly unwell (n = 7) Moderately unwell (n = 13) P value
Body weight (kg) 50.0 (42.0–59.0) 48.0 (40.0–64.0) 0.605 50.0 (42.0–59.0) 48.0 (40.0–64.0) 0.605
Dose (mg kg−1) 3.97 (3.96–4.00) 4.03 (3.33–4.05) 0.039 2.94 (2.93–2.96) 2.99 (2.47–3.00) 0.039
Number of points lambda 3 (3–5) 3 (3–4) 0.202 4 (4–5) 5 (4–6) 0.259
C0 (ng ml−1) 10 900 (3 860–21 500) 16 900 (6 140–28 700) 0.191 3030 (1570–3780) 3240 (2510–4360) 0.362
C0/dose (ng ml−1/mg kg−1) 2 730 (976–5 430) 4 160 (1 520–7 110) 0.166 1020 (535–1290) 1140 (850–1450) 0.251
CL (l h−1) 246 (159–273) 182 (101–410) 0.104 71 (55–107) 48 (33–66) 0.005
CL (l h−1 kg−1) 4.63 (3.20–5.85) 3.86 (2.29–10.20) 0.166 1.55 (1.23–2.14) 1.07 (0.68–1.48) 0.001
V (l) 40.9 (27.2–208.0) 33.1 (17.0–165.0) 0.143 112.0 (77.7–196) 71.1 (40.5–130.0) 0.016
V (l kg−1) 0.97 (0.54–4.15) 0.68 (0.39–3.36) 0.104 2.33 (1.85–3.92) 1.49 (0.84–2.54) 0.005
t1/2 (h) 0.12 (0.11–0.54) 0.12 (0.11–0.61) 0.552 1.12 (0.78–1.27) 0.98 (0.65–1.46) 0.285
AUC(0,∞) (ng ml−1 h) 856 (684–1 240) 446 (395–1 730) 0.219 1890 (1370–2410) 2670 (2010–4340) 0.001
AUC(0,∞)/dose (ng ml−1 h/mg kg−1) 216 (171–314) 259 (98–437) 0.166 645 (467–815) 932 (677–1460) 0.001
Back ext. AUC (%) 70.1 (32.3–75.7) 70.9 (61.2–76.6) 0.501 10.3 (7.45–15.7) 9.90 (5.33–14.2) 0.607
Ext. AUC (%) 0.04 (0.03–0.28) 0.06 (0.02–0.18) 0.663 1.20 (0.27–2.24) 0.91 (0.15–2.80) 0.874
(b) oral administration
ARS DHA
Mildly unwell (n = 7) Moderately unwell (n = 13) P value Mildly unwell (n = 7) Moderately unwell (n = 12) P value
Body weight (kg) 50.0 (42.0–59.0) 48.0 (40.0–64.0) 0.605 50.0 (42.0–59.0) 47.0 (40.0–64.0) 0.641
Dose (mg kg−1) 4.00 (3.87–4.03) 3.99 (3.98–4.09) 0.300 2.93 (2.87–2.98) 2.98 (2.88–3.03) 0.234
Number of points lambda 3 (3–4) 4 (3–5) 0.035 4 (3–5) 4 (3–5) 0.154
Cmax(ng ml−1) 170 (86.4–1 240) 226 (30.4–637) 0.552 975 (635–2110) 1180 (706–2000) 0.353
Cmax/dose (ng ml−1/(mg kg−1) 43.9 (21.5–310) 57.3 (7.78–157) 0.552 329 (219–712) 388 (234–664) 0.398
tmax (h) 1.00 (0.22–1.07) 1.00 (0.25–1.55) 0.775 1.00 (0.50–3.05) 1.50 (0.50–2.00) 0.602
CL/F (l h−1) 1 000 (634–1 400) 870 (545–1 540) 0.405 85 (72–128) 70 (35–101) 0.023
CL/F (l h−1 kg−1) 17.0 (12.7–29.2) 18.1 (10.3–34.2) 0.663 1.8 (1.4–2.6) 1.4 (0.9–2.5) 0.028
V/F (l) 372 (102–907) 176 (176–5 420) 0.501 128 (74–295) 85 (50–123) 0.014
V/F (l kg−1) 8.3 (2.0–15.4) 10.3 (3.9–113.0) 0.362 2.6 (1.6–5.9) 1.7 (1.1–2.6) 0.018
t1/2 (h) 0.26 (0.09–0.79) 0.36 (0.22–4.32) 0.322 1.02 (0.67–1.59) 0.84 (0.69–1.07) 0.447
AUC(0,∞) (ng ml−1 h) 233 (137–312) 207 (117–392) 0.663 1610 (1140–2040) 2180 (1190–3400) 0.023
AUC(0,∞)/dose (ng ml−1 h/mg kg−1) 58 (35–78) 52 (30–100) 0.663 542 (386–687) 721 (394–1130) 0.028
Ext. AUC (%) 1.21 (0.21–21.70) 0.95 (0.37–40.60) 0.905 2.60 (0.52–3.72) 1.41 (0.59–3.94) 0.612
F (%) 26.8 (12.6–37.7) 21.7 (13.5–75.0) 0.501 77.0 (71.1–107.0) 78.7 (42.3–129.0) 0.800

All estimates are given as median (range). P values are given using the two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test. Number of points lambda number of observations used in the log-linear regression in the terminal elimination phase, C0 initial predicted plasma concentration after i.v. administration, Cmax maximum observed plasma concentration after oral administration, tmax observed time to reach Cmax, CL clearance, V volume of distribution, t1/2 terminal elimination half-life, AUC(0,∞) predicted area under the plasma concentration–time curve after the last dose from zero time to infinity, Back ext. AUC percentage of AUC(0,∞) back-extrapolated from the first observation to time zero, Ext. AUC percentage of AUC(0,∞) extrapolated from the last observation to infinity and F (%) oral bioavailability.