Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;78(12):4102–4109. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07702-11

Table 2.

Impact of diet on the relative abundance (%) of TRF phylotypes detected in ileal digesta

Putative identityb No. of TRFs % maximum identity Dieta
SE P value
Control CF80 CF160 CR80 CFR
Lactobacillus mucosae/F 62 99 0.8 b 0.2 b 2.0 b 1.6 b 4.6 a 0.84 0.008
Lactobacillus reuteri/F 64 99 3.4 0.5 0.9 1.2 0.7 0.75 0.06
Mitsuokella multacida/F 205 93 0.4 b 0.8 ab 0 b 1.8 a 0.1 b 0.43 0.045
Clostridium butyricum/F 222 96 4.3 ab 9.1 a 1.0 b 6.6 a 1.3 b 1.70 0.02
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii/F 223 99 1.6 3.3 0.4 2.2 0.1 0.84 0.08
Ruminococcus flavefaciens/F 260 95 0.1 a 0.1 a 0 a 0.5 ab 1.7 b 0.44 0.04
Clostridiales bacterium/F 297 91 4.4 a 2.4 ab 2.7 ab 0.01 b 0.9 b 0.99 0.05
a

CF80, 80 g kg−1 chicory forage; CF160, 160 g kg−1 chicory forage; CR80, 80 g kg−1 chicory root meal (Inu60; Inter-Harz Gmbh, Germany); CFR, mix of 80 g kg−1 chicory forage and root meal. Data are presented as least-square means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters within rows indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).

b

F, Firmicutes.