Table 1.
Quantitative COMSAT analysis of biofilm architecture prior to and following induction of nutrient-induced dispersiona
| Condition and strain | Total biomass (μm3/μm2) | Thickness (μm) |
Roughness coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | Maximum | |||
| Prior to dispersion | ||||
| PA14 | 34.5 ± 3.4 | 39.2 ± 7.8 | 81.3 ± 15.0 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| ΔdipA mutant | 45.1 ± 2.2 | 46.9 ± 2.3 | 95.0 ± 5.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| ΔbifA mutant | 51.9 ± 12.9 | 59.9 ± 12.2 | 142.1 ± 12.9 | 0.57 ± 0.12 |
| Following induction of nutrient-induced dispersion | ||||
| PA14 | 1.2 ± 0.4* | 1.5 ± 0.6* | 12.7 ± 3.3* | 1.8 ± 0.1* |
| ΔdipA mutant | 44.7 ± 0.9 | 46.9 ± 1.3 | 95.0 ± 5.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| ΔbifA mutant | 2.94 ± 0.05* | 2.24 ± 0.08* | 24.6 ± 8.6* | 1.7 ± 0.37* |
COMSTAT analysis was carried out from biofilms grown in triplicate using at least 6 images per replicate. Dispersion was induced by addition of 18 mM glutamate to the growth medium. *, significantly different from biofilms prior to dispersion (P < 0.05), as determined by ANOVA and SigmaStat.