Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;194(11):2904–2915. doi: 10.1128/JB.05346-11

Table 1.

Quantitative COMSAT analysis of biofilm architecture prior to and following induction of nutrient-induced dispersiona

Condition and strain Total biomass (μm3/μm2) Thickness (μm)
Roughness coefficient
Avg Maximum
Prior to dispersion
    PA14 34.5 ± 3.4 39.2 ± 7.8 81.3 ± 15.0 0.8 ± 0.1
    ΔdipA mutant 45.1 ± 2.2 46.9 ± 2.3 95.0 ± 5.0 1.1 ± 0.1
    ΔbifA mutant 51.9 ± 12.9 59.9 ± 12.2 142.1 ± 12.9 0.57 ± 0.12
Following induction of nutrient-induced dispersion
    PA14 1.2 ± 0.4* 1.5 ± 0.6* 12.7 ± 3.3* 1.8 ± 0.1*
    ΔdipA mutant 44.7 ± 0.9 46.9 ± 1.3 95.0 ± 5.0 1.1 ± 0.1
    ΔbifA mutant 2.94 ± 0.05* 2.24 ± 0.08* 24.6 ± 8.6* 1.7 ± 0.37*
a

COMSTAT analysis was carried out from biofilms grown in triplicate using at least 6 images per replicate. Dispersion was induced by addition of 18 mM glutamate to the growth medium. *, significantly different from biofilms prior to dispersion (P < 0.05), as determined by ANOVA and SigmaStat.