Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2012 Mar 19;74(2):229–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00959.x

Table 2.

Odds Ratios (ORs) From Logistic Regression Models Predicting Spousal Support (N = 1,490)

Predictor Dimension of Spousal Support Being Predicted
Reliability
Openness
Discuss Health
OR SE OR SE OR SE
Spousal network overlap 1.23* 0.10 1.17** 0.07 1.35* 0.12
Age (divided by 10) 0.82 0.15 0.66** 0.08 0.79 0.16
Woman 0.72 0.15 1.33 0.29 0.78 0.18
Depression 0.77 0.11 0.63** 0.10 0.71 0.13
Time with spouse (ref: R spends free time w/spouse)
 R spends some free time w/spouse 0.83 0.21 0.68* 0.13 0.69 0.22
 R spends free time apart from spouse 0.37** 0.11 0.35*** 0.07 0.42* 0.18
Years of marriage (divided by 10) 1.02 0.09 1.02 0.06 1.10 0.13
Closeness to spouse 1.77** 0.38 1.97*** 0.21 1.82** 0.30
Spousal demands 0.62** 0.08 0.87 0.10 0.99 0.17
Spouse’s mental health 1.72*** 0.23 1.54*** 0.14 1.49** 0.19
Other support sources
 Reliability 1.77* 0.45
 Openness 4.20*** 1.03
 Health discussion 2.11* 0.62
Woman × other sources of openness 0.47* 0.14
F 7.59***a 8.68***b 6.45***a
Pseudo R2 .23 .19 .14

Note: Estimates are weighted to adjust for probability of inclusion in the analysis and differential nonresponse. All models are survey adjusted. Labor force status, spouse’s overall health, self-reported health, functional health, number of confidants, proportion of kin, and frequency of contact with kin are included in these models but not shown because of space constraints. All but the last of these were not significant. R = respondent; ref. = reference.

a

df = 19, 32.

b

df = 20, 31.

*

p < .05, two-tailed.

**

p < .01, two-tailed.

***

p < .001, two-tailed.