Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;56(6):2819–2823. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05344-11

Table 1.

Comparison of USP method with UPLC and BP-HPLC methodsa

Condition USP method for impurities (vancomycin hydrochloride for injection) BP method for related substances (vancomycin intravenous infusion) OTR-UPLC purity method
Instrument Specific instrument not provided Specific instrument not provided Waters Acquity UPLC system
Column L1 (4.6 by 250 mm, 5 μm) End-capped ODS silica gel (4.6 by 250 mm, 5 μm), e.g., Hypersil ODS Waters BEH C18 (2.1 by 100 mm, 1.7 μm with Waters BEH C18 (2.1 by 5 mm, 1.7 μm) guard column
Temp Does not state in method Ambient 35°C
Mobile phase A 92:7:1 (pH 3.2 TEA buffer-acetonitrile-THF) 92:7:1 (pH 3.2 TEA buffer-acetonitrile-THF) 5 mM KH2PO4 (pH 3.2)
Mobile phase B 70:29:1 (pH 3.2 TEA buffer-acetonitrile-THF) 70:29:1 (pH 3.2 TEA buffer-acetonitrile-THF) Acetonitrile
Gradient See Table 2 See Table 2 Linear acetonitrile gradient (5 to 15%) over 4.0 min
Flow rate (ml/min) 2.0 1.0 0.55
Wavelength for detection (nm) 280 280 230
Injection vol (μl) 20 20 5
Criteria for impurities For vancomycin B, NLT 80.0%; for any other impurity, NMT 9.0% For each impurity, NMT 4.0%; total impurities, NMT 12.0%; disregard limit, area of vancomycin peak in lowest concentration solution No criteriab
a

Abbreviations: ODS, octadecylsilyl; TEA, triethylamine; THF, tetrahydrofuran; NLT, no less than; NMT, no more than.

b

The OTR-UPLC method is not associated with BP/USP monographs.