Table 4.
Contextual Analysis Results
| Variable | Reference constructs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | Gp | Gc | Gv | Educ | Age | |
| English speakers (n = 296) | ||||||
| Source recognition (n = 293) | .22* | −.16 | .18 | −.08 | −.10 | 0.16 |
| CTT1 (n = 290) | −.14 | .28* | −.31* | −.03 | .06 | 0.08 |
| CTT2 (n = 287) | −.07 | .33* | −.35* | −.14 | .04 | 0.07 |
| CTT difference (n = 287) | .01 | .25* | −.24* | −.17 | .00 | 0.42 |
| Letter fluency (n = 292) | .30* | .01 | .33* | .02 | .13 | 0.02 |
| Category fluency (n = 293) | .22* | −.05 | .31* | .01 | .09 | −0.16* |
| VMI (n = 290) | −.01 | −.21* | .12 | .25* | .05 | 0.07 |
| Spanish speakers (n = 328) | ||||||
| Source recognition (n = 325) | .24* | .11 | −.02 | −.11 | −.01 | −0.12 |
| CTT1 (n = 326) | −.07 | .40* | −.21 | −.08 | −.05 | −0.01 |
| CTT2 (n = 315) | −.10 | .35* | −.19 | −.19 | −.05 | 0.10 |
| CTT difference (n = 315) | −.04 | .20* | −.08 | −.23 | −.04 | 0.13 |
| Letter fluency (n = 317) | .15 | −.10 | .36* | .13 | .15 | 0.08 |
| Category fluency (n = 327) | .22* | −.03 | .32* | .04 | .09 | −0.05 |
| VMI (n = 328) | −.04 | −.17 | .37* | .17 | .08 | 0.02 |
Note. Values are standardized regression coefficients predicting the target variable from the reference constructs. In the models with the English speaking sample, the error variance associated with the PPVT was negative and was therefore set to .02.
p < .01