Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell Biochem. 2009 Feb 6;327(1-2):15–19. doi: 10.1007/s11010-009-0036-2

Table 1.

Effect of nominally zero Ca2+ and TRPV1 antagonists on caffeine-evoked Ca2+ transients recorded in isolated nodose ganglion neurons

Control IRTX Zero Ca2+
Locke
Zero Ca2+
Locke + IRTX
n
304 ± 32     – 122 ± 29 6
405 ± 114 205 ± 53 220 ± 55 9
398 ± 73     – 244 ± 53 231 ± 53 5

Control BCTC Zero Ca2+
Locke
Zero Ca2+
Locke + BCTC
n

572 ± 73 395 ± 64 382 ± 59 8
395 ± 33     – 253 ± 25 245 ± 35 7

Each row represents a separate experimental series. TRPV1 antagonists, IRTX and BCTC, were used at 100 and 175 nM, respectively. Caffeine (10 mM) was applied for 15 s to evoke caffeine-induced Ca2+ transients (CICTs) measured with fura-2. Caffeine was applied at 1.5–3 min intervals. Drug or nominally zero Ca2+ Locke solution preceded the caffeine pulses by 0.5 and 2 min, respectively (see Figs. 1 and 2). The values are in nM. Zero Ca2+ significantly reduced the amplitude of CICT, row 1. The amplitude of the CICT in the presence of IRTX was not significantly different from that recorded in zero Ca2+ and both treatments were significantly different from control values, row 2. Addition of IRTX to zero Ca2+ Locke solution did not significantly change the amplitude of CICT. The amplitude of CICT recorded in zero Ca2+ Locke or IRTX plus zero Ca2+ Locke solution was significantly different from control values, row 3. BCTC significantly reduced the amplitude of CICT and its effect was not significantly different from that measured in zero Ca2+ Locke solution, row 4. The amplitude of the CICT in the presence of BTCT was not significantly different from that recorded in zero Ca2+ Locke solution, but both treatments were significantly different from control values, row 4. Addition of BCTC to zero Ca2+ Locke solution did not significantly reduce the amplitude of the CICTs, row 5. Statistical significance was assessed with an one-way ANOVA performed with Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc test to determine significance for pair-wise comparisons. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Data in row 1 were compared with a paired Student t test; n represents the number of nodose ganglion cells studied in each row