Table 2.
Summary of EPG parameters associated with phloem feeding in B. tabaci during the 6h recording.
| Parameter1 | Probability2 | Biotype | Host Plant (Mean ± SE) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biotype | Host | Biotype*Host | Tomato | Cabbage | Cucumber | Cotton | Poinsettia | ||||
| 11 | Total duration of E(pd)1 | 0.892 | <0.001 | 0.048 | B | 0.6±0.2bc3 | 3.0±0.4a | 0.1±0.0c | 0.7±0.2b | 0.4±0.1bc | |
| Q | 1.1±0.3b | 2.3±0.5a | 0.2±0.1c*4 | 0.8±0.2bc | 0.4±0.1bc | ||||||
| 12 | Number of E(pd)1 | 0.375 | <0.001 | 0.178 | B | 4.3±1.0b | 16.7±2.2a* | 1.2±0.4c | 5.1±1.6b | 3.9±0.9b | |
| Q | 4.2±0.7b | 9.9±1.4a | 2.0±0.6c* | 4.2±1.0bc | 3.5±0.7bc | ||||||
| 13 | Mean duration of E(pd)1 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.157 | B | 0.1±0.0b | 0.2±0.0a | 0.1±0.0b | 0.1±0.0ab | 0.1±0.0ab | |
| Q | 0.2±0.0a* | 0.3±0.0a | 0.1±0.0b* | 0.2±0.0ab* | 0.1±0.0b | ||||||
| 14 | Total duration of E(pd)2 | 0.077 | <0.001 | 0.258 | B | 39.4±9.1ab | 90.8±9.8a | 34.3±9.5b | 19.4±5.8b | 28.5±7.7b | |
| Q | 67.4±10.2ab | 82.9±11.7a | 26.2±6.5c | 28.4±5.0bc | 45.1±7.0ab* | ||||||
| 15 | Number of E(pd)2 | 0.413 | <0.001 | 0.174 | B | 4.3±1.0b | 16.7±2.2a* | 1.2±0.4c | 5.0±1.6b | 3.9±0.9b | |
| Q | 4.2±0.7b | 9.9±1.4a | 2.1±0.6c | 4.2±1.0bc | 3.5±0.7bc | ||||||
| 16 | Mean duration of E(pd)2 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 | B | 13.0±3.4b | 7.8±1.6b | 39.7±7.7a* | 9.1±4.9b | 10.2±2.6b | |
| Q | 22.4±4.3a* | 10.6±2.0a | 16.8±2.8a | 11.1±2.2a* | 21.2±4.7a* | ||||||
| 17 | Potential E(pd)2 index | 0.633 | <0.001 | 0.006 | B | 0.2±0.1ab | 0.3±0.0a | 0.3±0.1ab* | 0.1±0.0b | 0.2±0.0ab | |
| Q | 0.3±0.0a | 0.3±0.0a | 0.1±0.0b | 0.1±0.0b | 0.3±0.1a | ||||||
| 18 | Total duration of E(pd) | 0.062 | <0.001 | 0.263 | B | 37.7±8.9ab | 93.8±9.9a | 34.4±9.5b | 20.1±5.9b | 28.9±7.7b | |
| Q | 68.5±10.3ab | 85.2±11.8a | 26.5±6.5c | 29.2±5.1bc | 45.4±7.0ab* | ||||||
| 19 | Mean duration of E(pd) | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.007 | B | 13.1±3.4b | 8.0±1.6b | 39.8±7.7a | 9.2±4.9b | 10.3±2.6b | |
| Q | 22.6±4.3a* | 10.9±2.0a | 17.1±2.8a | 11.3±2.2a* | 21.3±4.7a* | ||||||
| 205 | Percentage of whitefly reaching phloem phase | - | - | - | B | 94.1a | 100a | 50b | 84.6ab | 88a | |
| Q | 92.0a | 100a | 57.7b | 76.9ab | 95.4a | ||||||
1 For parameters associated with time including 'durations' and 'time to an event', all units are minutes.
The parameters 11-19 were calculated for each insect and then averaged over all insects. Parameter 20 was calculated for all insects
of each treatment.
Total number = number of occurrences of a specific waveform
Total duration = total time in a waveform (summed over all waveform occurrences)
Mean duration = average waveform duration (total time divided by number of occurrences)
Potential E(pd)2 index = (total time in E(pd)2)/(Total recording time minus time to first E(pd)) (van Helden et al. 2000)
Percentage of whitefly reaching phloem phase = whitefly which reaching phloem phrase/all whiteflies tested in the treatment
2 Probabilities calculated from general linear model (Two-Way ANOVA) for a 2 x 5 factorial design (parameters 11-19).
Significant differences are highlighted in red (P ≤ 0.05).
3 Letters immediately after the mean values were derived from the comparisons of different host plants within the same whitefly species.
Means followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (Tukey test, P ≤ 0.05).
4 Comparison of feeding behaviors of B. tabaci B and Q adults on each of the five host plants. Significant differences are marked
with an asterisk (Independent-Samples T test, P ≤ 0.05)
5 Parameter 20 was analyzed with a Chi-square test