Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul;11(7):1142–1145. doi: 10.3201/eid1107.041165

Table 2. Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with asymptomatic versus pneumonic SARS*†.

Variable Asymptomatic SARS Pneumonic SARS p value‡ Controls p value§
Median antibody titer (range) 1: 4,000 (1:400–1:6,400) 1:6,400 (1:1,600–1:6,400) 0.013¶ NA NA
Mean age (SD) 26.5 (4.3) 29.6 (9.2) 0.706¶ 33.7 (11.5) 0.098#
Females (%) 6 (100) 32 (86) >0.999 49 (94) 0.321
No. who used masks (%) 3 (50) 3 (8) 0.025 21 (40) 0.002
No. who used gloves (%) 1 (17) 10 (26) >0.999 24 (46) 0.090
No. who washed hands (%) 4 (67) 29 (76) 0.63 47 (90) 0.110
No. who were close to a SARS patient (≤3 ft), % 5 (83) 35 (92) 0.456 48 (92) 0.747
Median contact time in minutes (range) 67.5 (10–360) 60 (10–480) 0.863¶ 30 (10–960) 0.879#

*SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; NA, not available.
†SARS serology–negative asymptomatic controls added for comparison. All p values from Fisher exact test or chi-square test, unless otherwise stated.
‡p value for comparing asymptomatic versus pneumonic SARS.
§p value for comparing any 2 pairs in the 3 groups. For multiple comparisons, level of significance was set at 0.017 using the Bonferroni method.
¶p values from Mann-Whitney test.
#p values from Kruskal-Wallis test.