Table 2.
Case study: the e-values of some enriched GO terms found by k=5 diverse short paths algorithm with different λ, given the starting node RTS1
| GO number | Function name | λ=0 | λ=0.25 | λ=0.5 | λ=0.75 | λ=1.0 | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0000075a | Cell cycle checkpoint | 4.55E-6 | 6.43E-6 | 1.75E-8 | 1.11E-11 | 5.27E-6 | (Chan and Amon, 2009) |
| GO:0004721a | Phosphoprotein phosphatase activity | 1.29E-5 | 4.38E-4 | – | – | – | (Wei et al., 2001) |
| GO:0004722a | Protein serine/threonine phosphatase activity | 7.89E-7 | 1.56E-6 | 1.51E-5 | – | – | (Wei et al., 2001) |
| GO:0005816 | Spindle pole body | – | – | 1.15E-4 | 1.53E-6 | – | – |
| GO:0007062a | Sister chromatid cohesion | – | – | 9.33E-3 | – | – | (Riedel et al., 2006) |
| GO:0007346a | regulation of mitotic cell cycle | 3.89E-5 | 1.34E-5 | 1.01E-8 | 6.65E-13 | 4.44E-6 | (Chan and Amon, 2009) |
| GO:0031929 | TOR signaling cascade | 2.67E-8 | 1.44E-8 | 1.44E-6 | – | 7.71E-3 | – |
aThese GO terms are in GOann, i.e. they annotate RTS1.
E-values larger than 0.01 are denoted by ‘−’, representing insignificance.