Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 3;2012:976972. doi: 10.1155/2012/976972

Table 4.

Comparison of gene expression levels among 6 different clones of spa types by measuring the band intensities of RT-PCR amplicons using nanodrop spectrophotometer (ng/μL).

gene aMLST
ST-121
spa-t3204
aMLST
ST-121
spa-t14413
aMLST
ST-121
spa-t159
bMLST
ST-239
spa-t4150
bMLST
ST-239
spa-t421
bMLST
ST-239
spa-t037
icaA 598.11 ± 1.06 698.19 ± 3.21 815.04 ± 3.1 796.19 ± 1.01 716.05 ± 0.74 515.06 ± 0.59
icaD 577.87 ± 12.14 675.76 ± 2.01 991.55 ± 1.1 875.88 ± 0.8 892.41 ± 2.33 691.37 ± 0.78
icaB 708.88 ± 2.04 803.77 ± 2.31 764.13 ± 0.8 601.87 ± 0.45 865.52 ± 1.02 864.48 ± 2.86
icaC 591.95 ± 1.8 699.88 ± 3.02 600.64 ± 12.1 998.94 ± 0.66 9001.65 ± 1.52 567.59 ± 3.22
fnbA 684.56 ± 5.7 785.49 ± 1.33 904.95 ± 14.1 488.55 ± 2.41 805.86 ± 1.10 504.71 ± 1.81
fnbB c 749.72 ± 2.11 909.17 ± 4.2 800.84 ± 1.23
Fib 544.35 ± 21.01 643.72 ± 9.02 783.13 ± 1.9 949.37 ± 3.01 681.78 ± 3.11 483.42 ± 12.1
cna 560.85 ± 14.1 661.93 ± 1.60 660.35 ± 0.6 360.84 ± 0.8 559.89 ± 2.81 360.81 ± 9.22
eno 461.06 ± 5.1 565.15 ± 11.5 558.28 ± 0.4 464.05 ± 0.77 454.92 ± 0.62 458.94 ± 0.96
ebps 542.18 ± 1.3 641.28 ± 2.12 506.78 ± 0.88 543.17 ± 9.1 405.14 ± 0.73 806.37 ± 0.89
bbp d 580.52 ± 2.4 684.39 ± 2.11 474.13 ± 2.03
clfA 955.26 ± 11.8 1051.49 ± 1.01 466.45 ± 2.01 552.29 ± 0.33 765.54 ± 2.39 766.68 ± 0.99
clfB 759.44 ± 2.1 859.67 ± 2.10 459.50 ± 1.04 755.41 ± 2.62 556.67 ± 0.59 659.81 ± 1.78

aThree clones of MLST sequence type ST121 belonging to clonal cluster 121 (CC121) with different spa types were showed to be weakly adherent to the surface of polystyrene microtiter plat after 48 h growth, these clones were found positive for 12 genes except the fnbB genec. bThree clones of MLST sequence type ST239 belonging to clonal cluster 8 (CC8) with different spa types were showed to be strongly adherent to the surface of polystyrene microtiter plat after 48 h growth, these clones were found positive for 12 genes except the bbp gened. Every six different clones showed statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) in the intensity of RT-PCR amplified products when fewer cycles were used (25) in the linear phase of amplification for most transcripts. The replicates of Rt-PCR products were done in duplicate.