Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gait Posture. 2012 Mar 28;36(1):102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.01.014

Table 1.

Step placement and metabolic cost values across visual perturbation conditions. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation, with lengths given in units of leg length, L. Asterisk (*) denotes statistical significance (P < 0.05) relative to the control condition. Perturbation conditions refer to fore-aft (F-A) and medio-lateral (M-L) directions, translational (T) and rotational (R) motions, and maximum amplitudes of 0.20 and 0.35 L.

Perturbation Step length
mean (L)
Step width
mean (L)
Step length
RMS (L)
Step width
RMS (L)
Net metabolic rate
(Mg1.5L0.5)
Control 0.686 ± 0.047 0.125 ± 0.023 0.018 ± 0.004 0.028 ± 0.007 0.109 ± 0.017
F-A T 0.20 0.681 ± 0.047 0.120 ± 0.033 0.019 ± 0.005 0.032 ± 0.008 0.102 ± 0.012
F-A T 0.35 0.686 ± 0.045 0.123 ± 0.026 0.020 ± 0.008 0.031 ± 0.008 0.108 ± 0.017
F-A T 0.20 0.682 ± 0.048 0.116 ± 0.028 0.017 ± 0.004 0.032 ± 0.008 0.105 ± 0.012
F-A R 0.35 0.690 ± 0.043 0.125 ± 0.027 0.020 ± 0.007 0.033 ± 0.006 0.108 ± 0.018
M-L T 0.20 0.686 ± 0.041 0.132 ± 0.036 0.022 ± 0.011 0.042 ± 0.011* 0.109 ± 0.019
M-L T 0.35 0.682 ± 0.049 0.129 ± 0.032 0.019 ± 0.004 0.044 ± 0.012* 0.109 ± 0.018
M-L R 0.20 0.684 ± 0.045 0.135 ± 0.039 0.021 ± 0.006 0.043 ± 0.012* 0.111 ± 0.024
M-L R 0.35 0.679 ± 0.040 0.149 ± 0.040* 0.023 ± 0.012 0.046 ± 0.019* 0.115 ± 0.022*