. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 6.

Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2012 May 17;20(6):1118–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.04.003

Table 1.

Performance of EPAD and several popular full-atom statistical potentials on the Rosetta decoy set.

	EPAD	DOPE	DFIRE	OPUS	RW	EPAD2
#natives identified	34	21	21	39	21	46
ranking of native	15.7	23.7	21.6	9.8	23.9	13.4
first-ranked GDT	51.6	49.7	49.4	49.7	48.5	52.4
Pearson CC	-0.42	-0.32	-0.25	-0.20	-0.32	-0.39
Z-score	-2.46	-1.61	-1.67	-3.27	-1.51	-3.28

Numbers in bold indicate the best performance. The per-target Pearson CC is calculated between the energy and GDT and then the average value is reported in the table.