Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 22;13(6):856–861. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.96

Table 3. Folate, vitamin B12 and homocysteine concentrations in cases and controls.

  Serum folate (nmol l−1) Serum vitamin B12 (pmol l−1) Plasma total homocysteine (µmol l−1) Red cell folate (nmol l−1)
Comparison of metabolite concentrations between cases and controlsa
Non-users of vitamins
Cases (n=110)c 12.89±5.92 281.18±84.18 13.25±5.86 649.14±203.61
Controls (n=123)c 14.73±6.00 300.23±91.76 12.77±7.59 714.48±223.36
P value (adjusted for age, smoking, abstinence time) 0.0063 0.44 0.077 0.044
P value (adjusted for age, smoking, abstinence time, education) 0.022 0.80 0.10 0.16
Users of vitamins with folic acid
Cases (n=32)c 26.81±18.59 355.96±124.35 10.57±2.77 984.32±333.63
Controls (n=34)c 25.46±14.94 346.44±104.98 10.29±1.90 1022.15±315.90
P value (adjusted for age, smoking, abstinence time) 0.84 0.48 0.73 0.55
P value (adjusted for age, smoking, abstinence time, education) 0.51 0.46 0.83 0.47
         
Risk of infertility (case–control analysis) associated with metabolite concentration, among non-users of vitaminsb
OR (95% CI): adjusted for age, smoking, abstinence time 0.36 (0.16, 0.78) 0.66 (0.23, 1.85) 3.18 (0.81, 12.47) 0.28 (0.08, 1.02)
P value 0.0094 0.43 0.097 0.054
OR (95% CI): adjusted for age, smoking, abstinence time, education 0.40 (0.18, 0.90) 0.87 (0.29, 2.64) 3.01 (0.78, 11.62) 0.32 (0.08, 1.30)
P value 0.027 0.81 0.11 0.11
a

Comparison using linear regression models; model covariates are listed as adjustment factors.

b

Logistic regression used to generate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI); each metabolite was examined in a separate model; model covariates are listed as adjustment factors.

c

Values are presented as mean ± s.d..