Table 5.
Author | Year | Study design | Mode of delivery | Gestational age (weeks) | Presentation | Birth weight | 5-min Apgar score <7 | Neonatal mortality | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VD/CS | N | Twin A breech (%) | Twin B breech (%) | Twin A (g) | Twin B (g) | Twin A N (%) | Twin B N (%) | Twin A N (%) | Twin B N (%) | ||||
Essel [11] | 1996 | Prosp cohort | VD | 41 | NR | 100 % | 85 % | NRa | NRa | NRa | NRa | NRa | NRa |
SC | 27 | NR | 100 % | 93 % | NRa | NRa | NRa | NRa | NRa | NRa | |||
p > 0.05 | p > 0.05 | p > 0.05 | p > 0.05 |
Significant differences were defined according to the definitions and statistics used in the different studies
VD Vaginal delivery, CS Caesarean section, N Number 1 of twin pairs, Prosp Prospective, NR Not reported
aEssel [11]: only the abstract was available