Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Eye Res. 2011 Jul 2;93(4):528–533. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2011.06.020

Table 1.

Characteristics and Comparison between PCACG and Control Patients

Case Male Female Age
(Y)		 T0
(mmHg)		 T
(mmHg)		 C/D
Ratio		 Duration
(D)		 Numbers
PCACG 36 18 17 54.3±1.6 35.1±1.6 34.5±1.3* 0.82±0.03 1.9±0.2 2.0±0.2
Control 20 13 7 67.7±1.4 14.6±0.6 14.6±0.6# 0.33±0.02 0 0
p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Notes: Case: eyes recruited into this study; Age: Y, years; History: M, months between onset of symptom to hospitalization; T0: initial IOP measured upon hospitalization; T: IOP measured before operation; C/D ratio: the cup to disk ratio; Duration: D, days between start of drug treatment and sample collection; Numbers: numbers of drugs applied before operation. The comparison of the same parameter between PCACG and Control was performed using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test.

*

p=0.909 vs. T0 of PCACG Group by Wilcoxon test for the paired, non-normally distributed data.

#

T of Control group was considered the same as the corresponding T0, because control patients with normal IOP received no treatment.