Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 13;7(6):e38861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038861

Figure 1. Comparison for the scores of three groups in eight SF-36 dimensions respectively, concluded that traditional poverty group and neo-poverty group were lower than general group in the eight SF-36 dimensions (p<0.05), and the scores of neo-poverty group was higher than traditional poverty group (p<0.05).

Figure 1