Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2012 Feb 14;1485:77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.014

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Extrasynaptic GABAARs and Tonic Inhibition in MGB. A) Confocal image of fluorescent immunolabeling of α4 (green, top left), δ (red, top right) and colocalized α4δ (yellow, bottom) GABAAR subunits in the MGB demonstrate the presence of the subunits necessary for functional tonically active extrasynaptic GABAAR constructs. Scale bar = 10μm. B) Voltage-clamp recording (CsCl based internal solution, Vhold = −60mV, ECl ≈ 0mV) of tonic inhibitory current mediated by extrasynaptic GABAARs in the MGB of a control 19 month old FBN rat (red, top) and from an MGB neuron contralateral to the sound exposed ear in a 24 month old FBN rat with behavioral evidence of tinnitus (blue, bottom) in response to 1μM gaboxadol (black bar) and blocked by 50μM gabazine (gray bar). C) Autoradiographs of 250nM [3H]gaboxadol binding in adult FBN rats with and without behavioral evidence of tinnitus (modified from Richardson et al., 2011). Relative optical density spectrum is positioned at right. At these concentrations, [3H]gaboxadol binds preferentially to extrasynaptic GABAARs. Binding density is highest in the MGB (outlined with solid line) and lower in auditory cortex (dashed line) and hippocampus (H). D) Binding scatchards and saturation curves (not shown) indicate a significant difference in [3H]gaboxadol binding between the MGB of control and animals with tinnitus and a 20–30% decrease in Bmax (x-axis), corresponding to a decrease in extrasynaptic GABAAR density in the MGB, while Kd (slope) (Kd=231.7±89.6 (control), 175.0±77.9 (contra), 208.3±87,95 (ipsi)) is relatively unaffected (n=5 control, 5 tinnitus).