Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar 9;44(6):530–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.09.002

Table 3.

Relationship between Exposure/Perceptions and Primary/ Secondary Outcomes for Body & Soul Early Intervention Group Participants at 6-Month Follow-up (n=273)

Process Variable %
(number
responded)
Fruit and
Vegetable
Intakea
Fruit and
Vegetable
Intakea
Self
Efficacy
(SE)
Autonomous
Motivation
(SE)
2-item SE 9-item SE
Recall of Body & Soul church events
Yes 79 (189) 6.15 0.12 5.00 0.43 3.30 0.85 5.87 0.12
No 21 (49) 5.45 0.23 4.26 0.31 3.29 0.10 5.42 0.09
P value 0.05 0.52 0.89 0.19

If yes, number of events attended
0 6 (11) 6.90 0.11 4.37 0.35 3.31 0.13 6.19 0.09
1 37 (65) 5.92 0.21 4.41 0.57 3.25 0.10 5.66 0.18
2 35 (63) 5.97 0.16 5.70 0.60 3.30 0.10 6.10 0.14
≥3 22 (39) 6.79 0.40 6.34 0.66 3.44 0.09 5.95 0.18
P value 0.05 0.09 0.36 0.15

Recall talking with PCb (phone/in person)
Yes 31 (72) 6.39 0.28 5.83 0.59 3.38 0.07 6.80 0.12
No 69 (160) 5.83 0.18 4.70 0.37 3.26 0.08 5.66 0.11
P value 0.02 0.08 0.47 0.02

If yes, number of calls/conversations
1 to 2 54 (37) 6.14 0.16 5.39 0.68 3.37 0.07 5.93 0.09
3 to 4 25 (17) 6.88 0.56 7.40 1.03 3.34 0.11 6.14 0.19
≥ 4 21 (14) 6.43 0.81 5.69 0.92 3.56 0.12 6.29 0.32
P value 0.13 0.21 0.42 0.46

If yes, who spoke more?
Participant 9 (6) 7.17 0.81 4.68 0.93 3.67 0.09 6.32 0.02
PCb 36 (25) 6.0 0.53 5.16 1.29 3.16 0.12 6.50 0.15
Same 39 (27) 6.59 0.35 6.64 0.58 3.56 0.06 6.11 0.17
P value 0.47 0.62 0.05 0.73

If yes, quality of PCb effort based on MI scale
≥3.75 38 (35) 6.38 0.47 5.79 0.91 3.42 0.74 6.60 0.16
3.5–3.75 21 (19) 6.16 0.23 5.54 0.88 3.53 0.10 6.28 0.14
3.16–3.5 19 (17) 6.65 0.47 5.26 0.79 3.23 0.06 6.11 0.20
<3.5 22 (20) 6.10 0.24 5.24 1.26 3.17 0.21 5.74 0.29
P value 0.37 0.73 0.21 0.58
a

Adjusted for baseline values

b

PC = Peer Counselor