Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Mamm Genome. 2008 Sep 12;19(6):406–412. doi: 10.1007/s00335-008-9122-0

Table 3.

QTL analysis

Locus name Marker Phenotype Position (cM)a Position (Mb) LOD score 95% CI Variance % p valueb Significance
Hmtb4 D5Mit338 Clot stability 59 107.7 3.1 55–66 16 0.0009 Significant
Hmtb5 D5Mit320 Bleeding 70 125.5 1.5 45–75 8 0.02 Suggestive
Hmtb6 D11Mit336 Clot stability 75.0 110.5 1.7 56–75 10 0.02 Suggestive
Hmtb8 D17Mit20 Clot stability 34.3 57.0 1.7 25–52 6 0.02 Suggestive
Hmtb9 D17Mit39 Clot stability 45.3 74.0 1.2 0–56 4 0.06 Suggestive
a

From Mouse Genome Database (2007). Number of F2 mice analyzed: chromosome 5, n = 79; chromosome 11, n = 76; chromosome 17, n = 130

b

Chromosome-wide