Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(7):735–745. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.001

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Attention and spatial acuity. Average gap-size thresholds (75% localization accuracy) for both exogenous (upper left panel) and endogenous (upper right panel) attention for the cued, neutral, and uncued conditions. The lower panels depict the average percent change in acuity thresholds at cued and uncued locations as compared to the neutral condition for exogenous (left) and endogenous (right) attention. Values below zero indicate a cost in acuity, whereas values above zero indicate a benefit. Error bars show ± 1 SE.