Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 14;344:e3675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3675

Table 5.

 Direct and indirect comparisons: absolute difference in events per 1000 patients treated*

Comparison Risk difference (95% CI)
Symptomatic venous thromboembolism Clinically relevant bleeding Major bleeding Net clinical endpoint
Direct comparisons:
 Rivaroxaban v enoxaparin −5 (−9 to −1) 9 (2 to 17) 4 (−0.4 to 8) −3 (−9 to 3)
 Dabigatran v enoxaparin −2 (−9 to 5) 5 (−4 to 13) −1 (−6 to 5) −1 (−9 to 7)
 Apixaban v enoxaparin −1 (−4 to 2) −8 (−15 to −1) −1 (−7 to 5) −1 (−6 to 3)
Indirect comparisons:
 Rivaroxaban v dabigatran −3 (−11 to 4) 5 (−7 to 16) 4 (−2 to 11) −2 (−12 to 9)
 Rivaroxaban v apixaban −4 (−9 to 1) 18 (7 to 28) 5 (−2 to 12) −2 (−9 to 6)
 Apixaban v dabigatran 1 (−7 to 8) −13 (−24 to −2) 0 (−8 to 7) 0 (−9 to 9)

*Random effects model, events while receiving treatment.