Table 4. Binary Logistic Regression Model for Associated Factors (Focus on Current Smoking Status and Different types of Tea Drinking Habits) of Metabolic Syndrome in Elderly Males Living in a Rural Community (N = 361).
Odds ratio | 95%CI | P | ||||||
Age | 1.02 | 0.97, | 1.08 | 0.45 | ||||
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 1.38 | 1.21, | 1.60 | <0.001 | ||||
Uric acid (mg/dl) | 1.44 | 1.16, | 1.80 | 0.001 | ||||
HOMA index# | 4.52 | 2.54, | 8.05 | <0.001 | ||||
hsCRP (mg/L)# | 1.22 | 0.94, | 1.59 | 0.13 | ||||
Occupational status | (No = 0, Yes = 1) | 0.74 | 0.37, | 1.47 | 0.39 | |||
Lived with partner | (No = 0, Yes = 1) | 1.49 | 0.67, | 3.33 | 0.33 | |||
Literate | (No = 0, Yes = 1) | 0.87 | 0.39, | 1.96 | 0.74 | |||
Alcohol drinking | (No = 0, Yes = 1) | 1.23 | 0.65, | 2.32 | 0.52 | |||
Coffee drinking | (No = 0, Yes = 1) | 0.92 | 0.27, | 3.14 | 0.90 | |||
Current tea drinking | ||||||||
(No = 0) | 1 | |||||||
(Fermented = 1) | 0.64 | 0.29 | 1.42 | 0.27 | ||||
*(Unfermented = 2) | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.84 | 0.01 | ||||
Current smoking habit | ||||||||
(Non-smoker = 0) | 1 | |||||||
(Ex-smoker = 1) | 1.68 | 0.84, | 3.33 | 0.14 | ||||
(Current smoker = 2) | 2.72 | 1.03, | 7.19 | 0.04 | ||||
Physical activity (IPAQ-short form) | ||||||||
(Low = 0) | 1 | |||||||
(Middle = 1) | 0.73 | 0.35, | 1.53 | 0.40 | ||||
(High = 2) | 0.77 | 0.34, | 1.74 | 0.53 |
HOMA: Homeostatic model assessment; hsCPR: high sensitivity C-reactive protein;
IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Dependent variable: without vs with metabolic syndrome.
:Log transformation.
Unfermented tea including green tea (unfermented) and oolong tea (partial fermented).
Nagelkerke R square = 0.526; Cox & Snell R square : 0.384.