TABLE 2.
Nonheterosexuality and Institutional Sanctions: Bivariate Analysis
| Same-Sex Attraction |
Same-Sex Relationship |
Nonheterosexual Self-identification |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experienced Same-Sex Attraction (N = 2336), % (P)a | Never Experienced Same-Sex Attraction (N = 12 863), % | Reported Same-Sex Relationship (N = 820), % (P)a | Did Not Report Same-Sex Relationship (N = 13 057), % | Identified as LGB (Other Than 100% Heterosexual) (N = 1491), % (P)a | Identified as 100% Heterosexual (N = 13 490), % | |
| Expulsion from school | 9.7 (.005)b | 7.2b | 9.6 (.25) | 7.9 | 5.2 (.01)b | 7.6b |
| Female | 5.8 (.009)b | 3.5b | 4.6 (.66) | 4.1 | 4.7 (.24) | 3.6 |
| Male | 14.7 (.01)b | 10.5b | 15.9 (.12) | 11.5 | 6.7 (.04)b | 11.2b |
| Stopped by police | 24.7 (<.0001)b | 19.8b | 26.2 (.018)b | 21.1b | 23.5 (.06) | 20.5 |
| Female | 16.2 (.0001)b | 9.6b | 14.1 (.15) | 11.0 | 19.5 (<.0001)b | 9.5b |
| Male | 35.9 (.003)b | 29.4b | 41.6 (.004)b | 30.8b | 33.5 (.33) | 30.2 |
| Arrested before the age of 18 | 6.3 (.09) | 4.9 | 7.0 (.12) | 5.3 | 5.2 (.94) | 5.2 |
| Female | 3.2 (.003)b | 1.3b | 3.1 (.08) | 1.6 | 4.1 (<.0001)b | 1.2b |
| Male | 10.3 (.20) | 8.3 | 11.9 (.16) | 8.8 | 8.0 (.78) | 8.7 |
| Juvenile conviction | 2.9 (.25) | 2.2 | 3.2 (.37) | 2.5 | 2.4 (.85) | 2.3 |
| Female | 0.9 (.08) | 0.4 | 1.0 (.12) | 0.5 | 1.3 (.0004)b | 0.4b |
| Male | 5.4 (.17) | 3.9 | 5.9 (.38) | 4.4 | 5.3 (.46) | 4.1 |
| Arrested after the age of 18 | 3.0 (.51) | 2.6 | 2.9 (.91) | 2.8 | 2.1 (.29) | 2.8 |
| Female | 1.1 (.015)b | 0.3b | 0.2 (.46) | 0.5 | 1.5 (.0001)b | 0.3b |
| Male | 5.4 (.58) | 4.7 | 6.1 (.52) | 4.9 | 3.5 (.38) | 4.9 |
| Adult conviction | 6.7 (.032)b | 5.2b | 7.3 (.20) | 5.7 | 5.3 (.84) | 5.5 |
| Female | 3.4 (<.0001)b | 1.3b | 2.5 (.40) | 1.8 | 4.3 (<.0001)b | 1.2b |
| Male | 11.0 (.10) | 8.8 | 13.3 (.13) | 9.5 | 8.1 (.56) | 9.2 |
a
Numbers in parentheses represent the P value compared with heterosexual youth, defined by the absence of the given indicator of nonheterosexual status.
b
P ≤ .05.