Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 May 11;38(9):1595–1606. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1834-9

Table IV.

ROC analysis results with area under the curve (AUC) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI), specificity (sp) and sensitivity (se) for each parameter regarding the two classification tasks.

Parameter ROC analysis
NR&PR(n=38) vs. CR(n=12) NR(n=13) vs. PR&CR(n=37)
AUC 95%CI Se(%) Sp(%) AUC 95%CI Se(%) Sp(%)
Age 0.51 [0.32–0.70] 83.3 31.6 0.55 [0.35–0.75] 86.5 36.5
Gender 0.61 [0.46–0.75] 27.3 94.3 0.51 [0.41–0.62] 90.9 11.4
T 0.70 [0.47–0.93] 60.0 89.3 0.64 [0.49–0.78] 100.0 33.3
N 0.64 [0.46–0.83] 60.0 68.8 0.55 [0.38–0.73] 70.0 40.6
M 0.56 [0.38–0.73] 70.0 41.2 0.70 [0.53–0.87] 70.0 70.6
AJCC stage 0.63 [0.43–0.84] 54.6 73.5 0.72 [0.57–0.88] 87.5 46.2
Histology type 0.51 [0.35–0.66] 72.7 28.2 0.60 [0.46–0.75] 42.9 77.8
SUVmax 0.65 [0.45–0.85] 33.3 94.7 0.54 [0.34–0.73] 30.8 89.2
SUVpeak 0.69 [0.49–0.89] 75.0 63.2 0.54 [0.35–0.73] 30.8 86.5
SUVmean TA1 0.67 [0.47–0.87] 50.0 84.2 0.54 [0.35–0.74] 89.2 38.0
TA2 0.67 [0.45–0.88] 50.0 94.7 0.51 [0.32–0.70] 100.0 16.2
FLAB 0.65 [0.43–0.87] 58.3 84.2 0.51 [0.32–0.70] 100.0 13.5
TL TA1 0.81 [0.65–0.97] 83.3 79.0 0.78 [0.63–0.93] 59.5 92.3
TA2 0.79 [0.63–0.96] 83.3 73.3 0.75 [0.61–0.90] 75.7 69.2
FLAB 0.79 [0.64–0.94] 83.3 65.8 0.82 [0.70–0.94] 59.5 92.3
TV TA1 0.79 [0.65–0.89] 75.0 81.6 0.79 [0.65–0.93] 78.4 69.2
TA2 0.74 [0.59–0.85] 83.3 57.9 0.81 [0.67–0.95] 94.6 53.9
FLAB 0.78 [0.64–0.88] 75.0 79.0 0.84 [0.72–0.96] 75.7 76.9
TLG TA1 0.81 [0.62–1.00] 66.7 92.1 0.78 [0.65–0.92] 92.3 56.8
TA2 0.80 [0.61–0.99] 75.0 86.8 0.80 [0.67–0.93] 69.2 81.1
FLAB 0.85 [0.73–0.98] 75.0 92.1 0.86 [0.75–0.98] 84.6 75.7