Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;19(6):814–825. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0058

Table 1.

Comparison of Quantifying Five E. coli Genomes Using Different Approaches

Strain MG1655 IAI1 Sakai UMN026 CFT073
Relative abundance 0 1 2 3 4
Reads uniquely mapped to individuals 156,429 160,321 172,985 185,128 188,202
Naive method 39.06 39.52 36.45 41.23 41.68
Estimated abundance (unique region approach) 1.19 20.46 33.59 60.49 81.21
Estimated abundance (redundant approach) 0.81 14.90 34.13 57.17 83.93