Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun;19(6):814–825. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0058

Table 5.

Comparison of Quantification of Nine Treponema Genomes Using Different Approaches

Strain Expected Mapped reads Naive method Unique-region Poisson-model
Azotonutricium ZAS-9 1 37,964 7.24 8.10 8.20
Brennaborense DSM 12168 2 60,255 14.50 16.19 16.41
Denticola ATCC 35405 3 155,749 40.28 14.50 20.52
Denticola f0402-1 4 163,131 43.85 18.56 26.67
Pallidum Nichols 5 56,087 36.24 41.27 41.62
Phagedenis F0421 6 168,700 43.82 48.62 49.49
Primitia ZAS-2 7 282,497 51.16 57.40 57.93
Succinifaciens DSM 2489 8 209,265 56.32 62.21 64.37
Vincentii ATCC 35580 9 226,432 66.21 74.29 74.74