Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Phys. 2012 Mar 2;396:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.08.015

Figure 3. Differences in predicted scattering vs. the wild type simulation at Scon = 2.5.

Figure 3

A: Scon = 1.9 wild-type simulation. B: wild-type simulation at 413K. C: +7G simulation. D: +3G simulation. All simulations use Scon = 2.5 and T=300K unless otherwise specified.