Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2010 Dec 17;64(2):153–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.001

Table 3.

Parameter estimates of models, Analyses of Region 3, Experiment 1

Fixed Effect Estimate SE z or t value p
Probability of Fixation (logistic analysis)
Stress (WS vs SW) −0.37 0.36 1.05 0.29
Consistency with Context −0.41 0.36 1.15 0.25
Interaction 1.30 0.53 2.46 0.014
Regressions Out (logistic analysis)
Stress (WS vs SW) −0.25 0.22 1.16 0.25
Consistency with Context 0.01 0.21 0.03 0.97
Interaction 0.51 0.30 1.73 0.08
First Pass Time
Stress (WS vs SW) −0.93 13.19 0.07 0.94
Consistency with Context −20.17 13.19 1.53 0.13
Interaction 26.23 18.56 1.41 0.16
Go-Past Time
Stress (WS vs SW) −6.85 38.66 0.18 n.s.
Consistency with Context −14.65 34.16 0.43 n.s.
Interaction 102.16 42.10 2.43 0.05
Go-Past Time Residuals
Stress (WS vs SW) −8.14 29.12 0.28 n.s.
Consistency with Context −21.68 27.34 0.79 n.s.
Interaction 95.12 36.78 2.59 0.05

Note: Probability of Fixation and Regressions Out analyses were computed with family binomial, so z values are reported. First pass time analysis was computed with random intercepts, so MCMC estimates of p values are presented. Go-Past time analysis used random slopes, so MCMC was not possible, and at of 2.0 is taken to be significant at the .05 level.