Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012 Apr 1;34(4):713–724. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.016

Table 4.

Summary of Logistic Models Predicting TANF Benefit Use among Low-Income Families (Below 200% of FPL) at Kindergarten

Socio-demographics Material Hardship Family Health State Predictors State Controls
Family Socio-demographic characteristics
 Income-to-Needs less than 50% FPL 1.70** (.17) 1.65** (.16) 1.65** (.17) 1.82** (.19) 1.86** (.20)
 Income-to-Needs 100%–150% of FPL .38** (.06) .40** (.06) .41** (.06) .39** (.07) .39** (.06)
 Income-to-Needs 150%–200% of FPL .16** (.02) .18** (.03) .18** (.03) .16** (.02) .16** (.03)
 Parent Education (1=HS degree or less) 1.07 (.11) 1.08 (.11) 1.05 (.11) 1.05 (.11) 1.07 (.11)
 Black .96 (.18) 1.05 (.18) 1.04 (.18) 1.27 (.17) 1.43* (.20)
 Hispanic .98 (.28) 1.04 (.30) 1.05 (.30) .83 (.12) .94 (.13)
 Asian 1.78 (.58) 1.93* (.59) 1.69 (.54) 1.22 (.40) 1.23 (.31)
 Other 1.05 (.17) 1.04 (.18) 1.07 (.18) 1.03 (.16) 1.12 (.18)
 Marital Status (1=married) .36** (.04) .38** (.04) .38** (.04) .39** (.03) .39** (.03)
 Maternal Employment (1=not employed) 2.36** (.24) 2.40** (.25) 2.45** (.26) 2.39** (.26) 2.39** (.27)
 Child Born in U.S. 1.60* (.35) 1.66* (.39) 1.57* (.35) 1.47 (.35) 1.40 (.33)
 Primary Language Spoken in Home (1=English) 1.61* (.31) 1.57* (.30) 1.52* (.28) 1.88** (.43) 1.87** (.42)
 City 1.47** (.17) 1.46** (.18) 1.45** (.18) 1.44** (.15) 1.36** (.14)
 Rural .86 (.20) .90 (.22) .92 (.22) 1.22 (.22) 1.07 (.20)
Family Experiences with Material Hardship
 Residential Instability (# of moves) 1.09** (.02) 1.09** (.02) 1.10** (.02) 1.09** (.02)
 Financial Troubles for 1 year or less .92 (.11) .90 (.11) .93 (.11) .93 (.11)
 Financial Troubles for more than 1 year 1.33* (.15) 1.29* (.14) 1.38** (.14) 1.41** (.15)
 Marginal Food Security 1.60** (.19) 1.56** (.20) 1.57** (.21) 1.55** (.20)
 Low or Very Low Food Security 1.55** (.13) 1.46** (.12) 1.41** (.11) 1.42** (.12)
Family Health Challenges
 Parental Health (1=fair/poor) 1.05 (.13) 1.06 (.14) 1.06 (.14)
 Parental Depression (logged) 1.45** (.20) 1.55** (.21) 1.52** (.20)
 Child Health (1=fair/poor) .84 (.15) .90 (.16) .89 (.15)
State-level predictors
 TANF Coverage (Inclusion) 2.28** (.35) 2.82** (.73)
 TANF Generosity (Adequacy) 1.22** (.04) 1.09 (.07)
State-level controls
 Food Stamp Coverage (Inclusion) 1.28 (.83)
 Food Stamp Generosity (Adequacy) .29** (.13)
 Medicaid/SCHIP Coverage (Inclusion) .57 (.23)
 Medicaid/SCHIP Generosity (Adequacy) .92* (.04)
 Governor is a Democrat .95 (.18)
 Democrat Controlled Senate & House 1.12 (.13)
 Republican Controlled Senate & House .63** (.11)
 Proportion of Blacks in State Population .07* (.08)
 Percent Female Headed Households 8.61 (24.08)
 Percent Children in Families below FPL 1.10 (2.20)
 Proportion of Immigrants in State Population .00 (.12)
 Log of 10th percentile female wage .72 (.24)
 Pseudo R2 .17 .19 .19 .23 .23
N (rounded to nearest 10) 6200 6130 6020 6020 6020

Note: Standard errors are adjusted for clustering of families within states and are presented in parentheses. Coefficients are reported in Odd Ratios.

Note: Sample sizes are rounded to nearest ten per NCES regulations.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.