Table 2.

List of neuroimaging studies in this meta-analytic study

Imaging studies	Imaging Tech	N	Specific Task				Stimulus									Emotion											Contrast
(First author)							Vis					Aud			Olf/Tas	Dimension			Pain	Soc	Discrete emotions
			Iden	Label	Mat	Int	Fa	W	Pic	Film	Sent	W	Sent	Snd		Pos	Neg	Ar			H	S	D	F	Ang	Sur	Ex vs I	E vs N
STIM (n = 20)
Nakamura	PET	7	o				o									o	o										o
Hariri	fMRI	16		o			o																	o	o	o	o
Narumoto	fMRI	8			o		o														o	o	o	o	o	o	o
Critchley	fMRI	9	o				o														o				o		o
Gorno-Tempini	fMRI	10	o				o														o		o				o
Lange	fMRI	9				o	o																	o				o
Winston	fMRI	12				o	o														o	o	o	o			o
Paradiso	PET	17	o						o							o	o											o
Liberzon	PET	10				o			o								o										o	o
Taylor	PET	10				o			o								o										o	o
Grimm	fMRI	29	o						o							o	o										o
Tabert	fMRI	9				o		o									o											o
Maddock	fMRI	8	o					o								o	o											o
Cunningham	fMRI	24	o					o								o	o										o
Imaizumi	PET	6	o									o									o		o		o	o	o
Wildgruber	fMRI	10				o							o					o									o
Wildgruber	fMRI	10	o										o								o	o	o	o	o		o
Royet	PET	12	o						o					o	o	o	o										o	o
Royet	PET	12	o			o									o	o	o										o
Royet	fMRI	28	o												o	o	o										o
Subtotals			12	1	1	7	7	3	5	0	0	1	2	1	3	8	11	1	0	0	6	3	5	5	5	3	16	7
SELF (n = 9)
Lane	PET	10	o						o							o	o										o
Gusnard	fMRI	24	o						o							o	o										o
Ochsnera	fMRI	13	o						o							o	o										o
Lee	fMRI	10				o			o							o	o											o
Phan	fMRI	12	o						o							o	o										o
Garrett	fMRI	9				o			o								o											o
Jacksona	fMRI	18				o			o										o								o
Hutcherson	fMRI	28				o				o											o	o					o
Rubya	PET	10	o								o									o							o
Subtotals			5	0	0	4	0	0	7	1	1	0	0	0	0	5	6	0	1	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	7	2
OTHER (n = 8)
Mitchell	fMRI	18				o	o									o											o
Ochsnera	fMRI	13	o						o							o	o										o
Jackson	fMRI	15				o			o										o									o
Jacksona	fMRI	18				o			o										o								o
Vollm	fMRI	15				o			o											o							o
Lawrence	fMRI	12	o							o											o				o		o
Hynes	fMRI	20	o								o									o							o
Rubya	PET	10	o								o									o							o
Subtotals			4	0	0	4	1	0	4	1	2	0	0	0	0	2	1	0	2	3	1	0	0	0	1	0	7	1
			Specific Task				Stimulus Type									Emotion											Contrast
							Vis					Aud			Olf/Tas	Dimension			Pain	Soc	Discrete
			Iden	Label	Mat	Int	Fa	W	Pic	Film	Sent	W	Sent	Snd		Pos	Neg	Ar			H	S	D	F	Ang	Sur	Ex vs I	E vs N
Totals			21	1	1	15	8	3	16	2	3	1	2	1	3	15	18	1	3	4	8	4	5	5	6	3	30	10

Imaging Tech = Imaging Technique, Specific Task: Iden. = Identification Task, Label = Labelling Task, Mat = Matching Task, Int = Intensity Task, Stimulus: Vis = Visual, Aud = Auditory, Olf/Tas = Olfactory/Taste, Fa = Face, W = Word, Pic = Picture, Sent = Sentence, Snd = Sound, Emotion: Pos = Positive, Neg = Negative, Ar = Arousal, Soc = Social, H = Happy, S = Sad, D = Disgust, F = Fear, Ang = Anger, Sur = Surprise, Contrast: Ex = Explicit Condition, I = Implicit/other control (e.g., rest) Condition, E = Emotional Condition, N = Neutral Condition. (i) Lists of studies in STIM (Imaizumi et al., 1997; Nakamura et al., 1999; Paradiso et al., 1999; Critchley et al., 2000; Hariri et al., 2000; Liberzon et al., 2000; Narumoto et al., 2000; Royet et al., 2000; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2001; Royet et al., 2001; Tabert et al., 2001; Lange et al., 2003; Maddock et al., 2003; Royet et al., 2003; Taylor et al., 2003; Winston et al., 2003; Cunningham et al., 2004; Wildgruber et al., 2004; Wildgruber et al., 2005; Grimm et al., 2006); (ii) Lists of studies in SELF (Gusnard et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2004; Ochsner et al., 2004a; Phan et al., 2004; Ruby and Decety, 2004; Garrett and Maddock, 2006; Jackson et al., 2006; Lane et al., 1997; Hutcherson et al., 2005); (iii) Lists of studies in OTHER (Ochsner et al., 2004a; Ruby and Decety, 2004; Jackson et al., 2005; Mitchell et al., 2005; Hynes et al., 2006; Lawrence et al., 2006; Jackson et al., 2006; Vollm et al., 2006).

^aThe studies that examine two evaluation tasks and directly compare their effects.