Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Urban Econ. 2010 Oct 22;69(3):253–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.006

Table 1.

Share of urban households with connection to public water service.

Percent with central water connection (locality average) Percent with central water connection (weighted by number of urban HHs in locality) Number of localities with water Total number of localities
Average for sample of 327 localities in 54 multi-locality metro areas, at least 50% urbanized by decade
1970 50 58 156 185
1980 69 80 271 278
1991 83 91 326 327
2000 89 92 326 326
1991 Breakdown
 Own house but not land 74 82 326 327
 Own house and land 85 91 326 327
 Small houses 74 83 326 327
 Large houses 89 95 326 327
 Poorest 20% of Households 76 85 326 327
 Richest 20% of Households 89 95 326 327
Average for localities in multi-locality metro areas, at least 50% urbanized by 1970
1970 50 58 156 185
1980 75 82 183 185
1991 89 92 185 185
2000 92 93 185 185
Average for localities in multi-locality metro areas, less than 50% urbanized by 1970
1970 34 47 94 142
1980 53 63 128 142
1991 76 78 141 142
2000 84 83 142 142

Notes: We consider localities that have less than 10% of houses serviced as having no service. Even though there may be in fact zero service, some households may have mistakenly declared in the census that they had service or service may be incipient. We weight the share of servicing in each locality by the number of urban households in the locality in each decade. When the weighted share of urban households serviced is greater than the unweighted share, this implies that the mean level of servicing is higher in larger localities.