Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Urban Econ. 2010 Oct 22;69(3):253–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.006

Table A1.

Rent hedonics.

Sao Paulo Rio de Janeiro


(1) All (2) All (3) Poorest 20% Mean for All (4) All (5) All (6) Poorest 20% Mean for All
Dependent variable: Ln(Rent), 1980
Water, central conn., indoor plumbing 0.389***
(0.021)
0.352***
(0.027)
0.89 0.413***
(0.022)
0.353***
(0.026)
0.91
Water, central conn., no indoor plumbing 0.093***
(0.022)
0.086***
(0.027)
0.06 0.095***
(0.023)
0.118***
(0.027)
0.06
Water, well, indoor plumbing 0.265***
(0.023)
0.285***
(0.029)
0.02 0.169***
(0.036)
0.251***
(0.048)
0.01
Water, well, no indoor plumbing 0.038
(0.023)
0.031
(0.029)
0.02 −0.089***
(0.033)
0.014
(0.040)
0.01
Central sewer 0.127***
(0.006)
0.073***
(0.010)
0.63 0.202***
(0.011)
0.130***
(0.015)
0.89
Septic system, own house 0.077***
(0.006)
0.097***
(0.010)
0.13 0.087***
(0.024)
−0.022
(0.041)
0.01
Septic system, shared with others −0.043***
(0.007)
−0.027**
(0.010)
0.06 0.004
(0.036)
0.042
(0.044)
0.00
Electricity, metered 0.302***
(0.013)
0.253***
(0.021)
0.65 0.304***
(0.022)
0.354***
(0.035)
0.77
Electricity, unmetered 0.018
(0.013)
0.102***
(0.020)
0.34 −0.017
(0.022)
0.158***
(0.035)
0.21
Water from general system 0.182***
(0.007)
0.95 0.222***
(0.015)
0.96
Full service (water, sewer, electricity) 0.195***
(0.004)
0.60 0.362***
(0.007)
0.84
Controls: House Characteristics, District Fixed Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Number of Households 201,001 201,001 46,585 201,001 109,166 109,166 25,149 109,166
Districts 56 56 56 24 24 24
R2 0.53 0.50 0.35 0.55 0.54 0.36

Notes: Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. Since the poorest 20% of households are disproportionately renters, they comprise more than 20% of the sample.

*

Significant at 10% level.

**

Significant at 5% level.

***

Significant at 1% level.