Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Sep 17;31(8):1324–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.002

Table 1.

Review of Empirical Findings on Predictors of Female Antisocial Behavior.

Summary of Empirical Studies
Predictors Authors Method Sample Do the findings evidence risk
for female antisocial behavior?
Heritability • Jacobson, Prescott, & Kendler (2002) Retrospective Female & Male
▪ 2580 adult twin pairs & 1622 unmatched adult twins
Additive Genetic Effect YES
Rhee & Waldman (2002) Meta-analysis of 17 twin studies Female & Male
▪ Children, adolescents, & adults
Additive Genetic Effect YES
Arseneault et al. (2003) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1116 high-risk child twin pairs
Additive Genetic Effect YES
• Hudziak et al. (2003) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 14859 child twin pairs
Additive Genetic Effect YES
• Gelhorn et al. (2005) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1100 child twin pairs
Additive Genetic Effect YES
McGue,Iacono, & Krueger (2006) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1080 adolescents
Additive Genetic Effect YES
Hicks et al.(2007) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 626 adolescent twin pairs
Additive Genetic Effect YES
• Maes, Silberg, Neale, & Eaves (2007) Longitudinal & Retrospective Female & Male
▪ 4486 adolescent twin pairs
Additive Genetic Effect YES
Van Hulle et al. (2007) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 2403 adolescents
Additive Genetic Effect YES
• Goldstien, Prescott, & Kendler (2001) Retrospective Females only
▪ 971.5 adult twin pairs
Additive Genetic Effect YES
Genotype Widom & Brzustowicz (2006) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 600 (300 high-risk) adults
MAO-A short allele +
childhood adversity
MAO-A long allele +
childhood adversity
YES

NO
Frazzetto et al (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 235 (90 high-risk) adults
MAO-A short allele +
early traumatic events
MAO-A long allele +
early traumatic events
NO

NO
• Wakshlag et al. (2009) Prospective Female & Male
▪ 176 adolescents
MAO-A short allele +
prenatal cigarette
exposure
MAO-A long allele +
prenatal cigarette
exposure
NO

YES
Caspi et al.(2002– Note 30) Longitudinal Females only
▪ 481 adolescents
MAO-A short allele +
childhood maltreatment
MAO-A long allele +
childhood maltreatment
YES

NO
Nilsson et al. 2007) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 114 adolescents
MAO-A short allele +
childhood adversity
MAO-A long allele +
childhood adversity
NO

YES
Sjoberg et al.(2007) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 119 adolescents with varying risk
MAO-A short allele +
childhood adversity
MAO-A long allele +
childhood adversity
NO

YES
Ducci et al. (2008) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 291 (half high-risk) adults
MAO-A short allele +
childhood adversity
MAO-A long allele +
childhood adversity
YES

NO
Gokturk et al. (2008) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 741 (110 high-risk) adults
MAO-A short allele
MAO-A long allele
NO
YES
Prom-Wormley et al. (2008) Longitudinal Females only
▪ 721 children & adolescents
MAO-A short allele
MAO-A long allele
YES
NO
Kinnally et al. (2009) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 159 adults
MAO-A short allele +
low paternal care
MAO-A long allele +
low paternal care
NO

YES
Personality/Temperament Caspi, Henry, McGee, Moffitt, & Silva (1995) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 925 children
Lack of control YES
Guerin, Gottfried, & Thomas (1997) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 130 children
Difficult temperament YES
Krueger, McGue, & Iacono (2001) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1180 adults
Dysconstraint YES
Miller & Lynam (2001) Meta-analysis of 59 studies Female & Male
▪ Adolescents, & adults
Psychoticism, low
agreeableness, negative
emotionality, novelty
seeking, low
conscientiousness
YES
Lynam, Leukefeld, & Clayton (2003) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 481 adults
Stability in personality
from adolescence to
adulthood
YES
Taylor & Iacono (2007) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 827 adolescents
Dysconstraint, aggression YES
Parenting Style Rothbaum & Weiz (1994) Meta-analysis of 13 studies Female & Male
▪ Children & adolescents
Parental caregiving YES
Brody & Flor (1998) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 156 high-risk children
Maternal social +
financial resources
YES
Avry, Duncan, Duncan, & Hops (1999) Longitudinal Femal & Male
▪ 204 adolescents
Parent-child involvement
and relations
YES
Scaramella, Conger, & Simons (1999) Longitudinal Femal & Male
▪ 319 adolescents
Parental warmth, low
hostility, child
management skills
YES
Pettit, Laird, Dodge, Bates, & Criss (2001) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 440 adolescents
Psychological control YES
• Pittman & Chase-Lansdale (2001) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 302 high-risk adolescents
Low warmth &
supervision
YES
Gershoff (2002) Meta-analyses of 11 studies Female & Male
▪ Children, adolescents, & adults
Corporal punishment:
Female < Male
YES
Zhou et al. (2002) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 180 children
Parental warmth &
positive expressiveness
YES
Thornberry, Freeman-Gallant, Lizotte, Krohn, & Smith (2003) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ Children, adolescents, & adults
Parental warmth &
Consistency
YES
Eisenberg et al. (2005) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 186 adolescents
Positive parenting YES
Reitz, Dekovic, & Meiger (2006) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 650 adolescents
Parenting style YES
Hart, O’Toole, Price-Sharps, & Shaffer (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 124 adolescents
Parental responsiveness
& demandingness
YES
Manongdo & Garcia (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 91 adolescents
Maternal supportive
parenting
YES
Jones et al. (2008) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 196 high-risk children
Maternal warmth YES
Miner & Clarke-Stewart (2008) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1,364 children
Mother sensitivity YES
Blatt-Eisengart, Drabick, Monahan, & Steinberg (2009) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1,364 children
Maternal intrusiveness YES
McDonald, Jouriles, Tart, & Minze (2009) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 258 high-risk children
Parent-child aggression YES
Parental
Monitoring
Kim, Hetherington, & Reiss (1999) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 654 adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Formoso, Gonzales, & Aiken (2000) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 284 high-risk adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Stattin & Kerr (2000) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 703 adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Donenberg, Wilson, Emerson, & Bryant (2002) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 169 high-risk adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Bowman, Prelow, & Weaver (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 135 high-risk adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Fulkerson, Pasch, Perry, & Komro (2008) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 3,250 adolescents with varying risk
Parental monitoring YES
Laird, Criss, Pettit, Dodge, & Bates (2008) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 504 adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Vieno, Nation, Pastore, & Santinello (2009) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1,147 adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Windle et al. (2010) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 598 children
Parental monitoring YES
Cernkovich, Lanctot, & Giordano (2008) Longitudinal Females only
▪ 109 high- risk adolescents
Parental monitoring YES
Deviant Peers Mears, Ploeger, & Warr (1998) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1,626 adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Liu & Kaplan (1999) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 2,753 adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Erickson, Crosnoe, & Dornbusch (2000) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 2,000 adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Ardelt & Day (2002) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 121 high-risk adolescents
Deviant peers YES
• Werner & Silbereisen (2003) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 248 adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Chapple, Johnson, & Whitbeck (2004) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 309 adolescent runaways
Deviant peers NO
Heinze, Toro, & Urberg (2004) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 401 (252 high-risk) adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Piquero, Gover, MacDonald, & Piquero (2005) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1600 adolescents
Deviant peers NO
• Jennings, Maldonado-Molina, & Komro (2010) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 3,038 adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Hubbard & Pratt (2002) Meta-analysis of 97
effect size estimates
Females only
▪ Children & adolescents
Deviant peers YES
Early Menarche Flannery et al. (1993) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 773 adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Beaver & Wright (2005) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 6504 adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Ge, Brody, Conger, Simons, & McBride-Murray (2006) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 867 adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Negriff & Trickett (2009) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 454 high-risk adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Dick, Rose, Viken, & Kaprio (2000) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 3065 adolescent twin pairs
Early Puberty +
urban context
YES
Haynie (2003) Cross-sectional Females only
▪ 5477 adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Kaltiala-Heino et al. (2003) Cross-sectional Female & male
▪ 36, 549 adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Obeidallah et al. (2004) Longitudinal Females only
▪ 501 adolescents
Early Puberty +
Neighborhood
disadvantage
YES
Burt, McGue, DeMarte, Krueger & Iacono (2006) Longitudinal Female only
▪ 708 mid-adolescent twins
Early Puberty YES
Lynne et al. (2007) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1366 early adolescents
Early Puberty (mediated
by association with
delinquent peers)
YES
Susman, Dockray, Schiefelbein, Heaton, Dorn, & Herwehe (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 111 early adolescents
Early puberty YES
Negriff, Fung & Trickett (2008) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 454 adolescents
Early Puberty YES
Najman, Hayatbakhsh, McGee, Bor, O’Callaghan & Williams (2009) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 2,784 adults followed up for 21 years
Early Puberty YES
Carter, Jaccard, Silverman & Pina (2009) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 102 high risk adolescent girls
Early Puberty + urban
context
YES
Sexual Abuse Garnefski & Arends (1998) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1490 adolescents
Sexual abuse YES
Mason, Zimmerman & Evans (1998) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 396 incarcerated adolescents
Sexual abuse YES
Acoca (1999) Cross-sectional qualitative Female only
▪ 193 interviews and
   956 case file reviews,
   incarcerated
   adolescent girls
Sexual abuse YES
• MacMillan et al. (2001) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 7016 adults
Sexual abuse YES
• Phan & Kingree (2001) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 272 arrested adolescents
Sexual abuse YES
• McCabe, Lansing, Garland, & Hough (2002) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 625 high-risk adolescents
Sexual abuse YES
Gault-Sherman, Silver, & Sigfusdottir (2009) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 8618 adolescents & young adults
Sexual abuse YES
Verona & Sachs-Ericsson (2005) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 5424 adults
Child abuse YES
Herrera & McCloskey (2003) Longitudinal Female only
▪ 141 children followed through adolescence
Sexual abuse YES
Siegel & Williams (2003) Longitudinal Females only
▪ 411 victims of sexual
   abuse & 205 matched
   controls; adults
Sexual abuse YES
Bergen, Martin, Richardson, Allison, & Roger (2004) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 7,361 adolescents from 27 schools
Sexual abuse YES
Wright, Friedrich, Cinq-Mars, Cyr, & McDuff (2004) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 3 samples (Ns = 140,
   430, and 94) of
   varying risk
Sexual abuse YES
• Gunnison & McCartan(2005) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 131 incarcerated adults
Sexual abuse YES
Arata, Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Bowers, & O’Brien (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 1,452 adolescents
Sexual abuse YES
Leeb, Barker, & Strine (2007) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 3,487 high-risk adolescents
Sexual abuse YES
Cernkovich, Lanctot, & Giordano (2008) Longitudinal Females only
▪ 109 high-risk adults
Sexual abuse YES
Hahm, Lee, Ozonoff, & Wert (2010) Longitudinal Female only
▪ 7,576 adults
Sexual abuse + other
types of maltreatment
YES
Romantic Partners/ -Sex Friends Seffrin, Giordano, Manning, & Longmore (2009) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1,090 adolescents
Antisocial romantic partner YES
• Arndorfer & Stormshak (2008) Longitudinal Female &Male
▪ 955 adolescents
Opposite-sex friends YES
Haynie, Steffensmeier, & Bell (2007) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 14,044 adolescents
Opposite-sex friends YES
Rebellon & Manasse (2004) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 1,725 adolescents
Opposite-sex romantic
partner
YES
Haynie, Giordano, Manning, & Longmore (2005) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 2,945 adolescents
Antisocial romantic
partner
YES
Simons, Stewart, Gordon, Conger, & Elder (2002) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 236 adolescents
Antisocial romantic
partner
YES
Moffitt et al. (2001) Longitudinal Female & Male
▪ 211 adults
Antisocial romantic
partner
YES
Caspi, Lynam, Moffitt, & Silva (1993) Longitudinal Female only
▪ 479 adolescents
Opposite-sex friends +
mixed-sex schools
YES
Intimate
Partner
Violence
Katz (2000) Longitudinal Female only
▪ Waves 1 and 7 of the
   National Longitudinal
   Study, adolescents &
   adults
IPV YES
Carbone-Lopez et al. (2006) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 16,000 adults
IPV YES
Simpson et al (2008) Cross-sectional mixed-methods Female only
▪ 351 adults (forensic sample)
IPV YES
• Kruttshnitt & Carbon-Lopez (2006) Cross-sectional
qualitative
Female only
▪ 205 adults (forensic sample)
IPV YES
Pettiway (1997) In-depth qualitative Female only
▪ 5 case studies
IPV YES
Sex Work • Bertrand & Nadeau (2006) Qualitative Female only
▪ 21 adult women (in treatment)
Sex work YES
• Greiger (2006) In-depth qualitative Female only
▪ 8 case studies (forensic sample)
Sex work YES
Johnson (2006) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 470 adults (forensic sample)
Sex work YES
Norton-Hawk (2004) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 50 adults (forensic sample)
Sex work + male pimps YES
• Pedersen & Hegna (2003) Cross-sectional Female & Male
▪ 10,828 adolescents
Sex work YES
Cusick (2002) Qualitative Female & Male
▪ Youth prostitution
Sex work YES
Yacoubian et al (2001) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 3.587 adults (forensic sample)
Sex work YES
Dalla (2000) In-depth qualitative Female only
▪ 43 adult sex workers
Sex work YES
Graham & Wish (1994) Cross-sectional
mixed-methods
Female only
▪ 164 adults (forensic sample)
Sex work YES
Sharpe (1998) In-depth qualitative Female only
▪ 40 female sex workers
Sex work YES
Kuhns et al (1992) Cross-sectional Female only
▪ 53 sex workers and 47 arrestees
Sex work YES