Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 15;7(6):e39076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039076

Table 6. Virtual screening performance of our new method 2SBR-SVM and that of our previously used method Combi-SVM in scanning 168,016 MDDR compounds and 657,736 ChEMBLdb compounds, and 13.56 million Pubchem compounds.

Dopamine receptor subtype Method Number and Percent of the 13.56M PubChem Compounds Identified as subtype selective ligands Number and Percent of the 168,016 MDDR Compounds Identified as subtype selective ligands Number and Percent of the 657,736 ChemBLdb Compounds Identified as subtype selective ligands
D1 SVM (Single Label) 6798(0.0501%) 463(0.28%) 1034(0.16%)
Combi-SVM 4948(0.0365%) 383(0.23%) 755(0.11%)
2SBR-SVM 650(0.0048%) 140(0.08%) 355(0.05%)
D2 SVM (Single Label) 17786(0.1312%) 1105(0.66%) 3208(0.49%)
Combi-SVM 10080(0.0743%) 712(0.42%) 2023(0.31%)
2SBR-SVM 1132(0.0083%) 108(0.06%) 686(0.10%)
D3 SVM (Single Label) 19813(0.1461%) 1149(0.68%) 3057(0.46%)
Combi-SVM 6055(0.0447%) 679(0.40%) 1894(0.29%)
2SBR-SVM 1498(0.0110%) 156(0.09%) 687(0.10%)
D4 SVM (Single Label) 21444(0.1581%) 1160(0.69%) 3489(0.53%)
Combi-SVM 9186(0.0677%) 790(0.47%) 2579(0.39%)
2SBR-SVM 1961(0.0145%) 134(0.08%) 907(0.14%)

For comparison, the results of single label SVM, which identify putative subtype binding ligands regardless of their possible binding to another subtype, are also included.