Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 15;7(6):e38772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038772

Table 1. The performance of models trained with various features for methylarginine.

Training features Sn (%) Sp (%) Acc (%) MCC (%)
SPC 68.96±1.52 92.71±1.09 86.78±0.56 63.78±1.66
PWAA 60.85±0.57 95.51±0.50 86.85±0.41 62.76±1.16
ASA 51.94±0.15 99.81±0.15 87.84±0.12 66.37±0.45
VDWV 56.34±1.22 98.91±0.34 88.24±0.54 67.08±1.81
SPC+PWAA 71.66±2.14 91.87±0.60 86.82±0.75 64.40±2.55
SPC+ASA 65.69±1.22 95.46±0.69 88.01±0.68 66.42±1.93
PWAA+ASA 66.42±2.37 92.13±0.90 85.70±1.02 60.72±2.78
SPC+PWAA+ASA 74.09±1.44 93.35±1.45 88.54±0.64 68.93±1.88
SPC+PWAA+VDWV 74.54±3.56 94.31±1.17 89.37±0.83 71.69±3.79
SPC+PWAA+ASA+VDWV 80.73±1.58 92.28±1.24 89.39±1.35 72.45±1.73

The corresponding measurement was represented as the average value±standard deviation. The window size was 15 and the ratio between positive and negative samples was 1∶3.