Table 1. The performance of models trained with various features for methylarginine.
Training features | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | Acc (%) | MCC (%) |
SPC | 68.96±1.52 | 92.71±1.09 | 86.78±0.56 | 63.78±1.66 |
PWAA | 60.85±0.57 | 95.51±0.50 | 86.85±0.41 | 62.76±1.16 |
ASA | 51.94±0.15 | 99.81±0.15 | 87.84±0.12 | 66.37±0.45 |
VDWV | 56.34±1.22 | 98.91±0.34 | 88.24±0.54 | 67.08±1.81 |
SPC+PWAA | 71.66±2.14 | 91.87±0.60 | 86.82±0.75 | 64.40±2.55 |
SPC+ASA | 65.69±1.22 | 95.46±0.69 | 88.01±0.68 | 66.42±1.93 |
PWAA+ASA | 66.42±2.37 | 92.13±0.90 | 85.70±1.02 | 60.72±2.78 |
SPC+PWAA+ASA | 74.09±1.44 | 93.35±1.45 | 88.54±0.64 | 68.93±1.88 |
SPC+PWAA+VDWV | 74.54±3.56 | 94.31±1.17 | 89.37±0.83 | 71.69±3.79 |
SPC+PWAA+ASA+VDWV | 80.73±1.58 | 92.28±1.24 | 89.39±1.35 | 72.45±1.73 |
The corresponding measurement was represented as the average value±standard deviation. The window size was 15 and the ratio between positive and negative samples was 1∶3.