Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2012 Mar 19;116(23):6781–6788. doi: 10.1021/jp212399g

Table 3.

Computed binding energies and energy components (kcal/mol) between H5O2+ and (H2O)4 using the iterative charge-updating optimization and variational multilevel X-Pol methods. The 6-31G(d) basis set is used in all calculations at the M06/MG3S optimized geometries.

H5O2+ (H2O)4 ΔEdist ΔEint ΔEele ΔEXD ΔEb
X-Pol optimization by iteratively updating MK charges
M06 M06 11.4 −100.5 −89.1 18.4 −70.7
M06 B3LYP 11.4 −99.0 −87.7 18.4 −69.3
M06 HF 11.3 −103.3 −92.0 18.4 −73.6
MP2 HF 10.9 −103.8 −92.9 18.4 −74.5
CCSD M06 11.1 −100.6 −89.5 18.4 −71.1
X-Pol optimization by iteratively updating MPA charges
M06 M06 11.5 −99.0 −87.5 18.4 −69.1
M06 B3LYP 11.4 −96.6 −85.2 18.4 −66.8
M06 HF 11.4 −103.1 −91.7 18.4 −73.3
MP2 HF 11.1 −103.7 −92.7 18.4 −74.3
CCSD M06 11.2 −99.2 −88.0 18.4 −69.6
X-Pol by variational optimization with MPA charges
M06 M06 10.7 −101.7 −91.0 18.4 −72.6
M06 B3LYP 11.3 −99.4 −88.1 18.4 −69.7
M06 HF 11.3 −105.8 −94.5 18.4 −76.1
MP2 HF 12.3 −106.7 −94.4 18.4 −76.0
CCSD M06 18.5 −102.4 −83.9 18.4 −65.5
Full wave function calculation without fragmentation
CCSD(T)a −69.7
a

Computed at CCSD(T)/MG3S//M062X/MG3S.