Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 9;2012:719250. doi: 10.1155/2012/719250

Table 1.

Comparison of neuropsychological performances of the two groups. Statistically significant differences are indicated in bold; confounders included in the logistic regression analysis are reported in italics. MMSE: Mini-Mental Sate examination; CDR: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale; RAVLT: Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test; MFTC: Multiple Features Targets Cancellation; ROCF: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure.

bvFTD (N = 28) AD (N = 20)
Mean SD Mean SD |z| p
MMSE 19.07 8.789 17.85 4.368 1.445 0.148
CDR 1.78 0.815 1.48 0.659 1.183 0.237
RAVLT immediate recall 20.59 12.858 17.45 7.702 1.005 0.315
RAVLT delayed recall 3.59 3.456 1.05 1.468 2.567 0.010
RAVLT recognition accuracy 77.37 22.047 72.00 16.403 1.616 0.106
RAVLT false alarms 8.89 8.916 11.10 7.137 1.352 0.176
Phonological verbal fluency 15.64 15.887 14.00 10.141 0.367 0.714
Semantic verbal fluency 6.79 6.373 9.00 4.634 1.849 0.065
Raven's colored matrices 18.18 7.822 15.94 7.630 1.340 0.180
Cube copy 2.65 1.285 1.90 1.242 2.034 0.042
Cube copy with landmarks 17.26 5.708 15.50 7.416 0.524 0.600
MFTC accuracy 80.71 24.424 73.33 19.538 1.401 0.161
MFTC time of execution 125.79 72.971 170.03 57.792 2.130 0.033
MFTC false alarms 5.96 9.796 9.65 12.874 1.174 0.241
Frontal assessment battery 7.88 6.124 8.30 2.726 0.199 0.842
Nouns denomination 17.85 8.198 23.01 4.382 2.180 0.029
Verbs denomination 13.52 7.223 16.95 5.562 1.492 0.136
ROCF copy 21.84 13.433 16.15 9.887 1.726 0.084
ROCF delayed reproduction 6.25 5.958 4.44 3.808 1.067 0.286
Stroop: interference/time 65.37 52.970 84.76 43.329 1.290 0.197
Stroop: interference/errors 10.72 11.353 15.11 10.907 1.418 0.156