Table 2.
Pearson correlations among study variables (intervention participants, N = 339).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) UMP | — | |||||||||
| (2) EXP | −.042 | — | ||||||||
| (3) ATP | −.445** | .064 | — | |||||||
| (4) Parent-reported open communication—baseline | .494** | −.271** | −.244** | — | ||||||
| (5) Parent-reported open communication—4 month | .306** | −.183** | −.117 | .643** | — | |||||
| (6) Parent-reported open communication—8 month | .291** | −.126 | −.080 | .477** | .534** | — | ||||
| (7) Parent-reported open communication—12 month | .340** | −.228** | −.046 | .565** | .632** | .589** | — | |||
| (8) Adolescent-reported direct monitoring—baseline | .091 | −.046 | −.090 | .080 | .029 | −.005 | .059 | — | ||
| (9) Adolescent-reported direct monitoring—4 month | .028 | .022 | −.122 | −.004 | −.030 | .005 | −.138 | .629** | — | |
| (10) Adolescent-reported direct monitoring—8 month | .097 | .027 | −.169* | .075 | .013 | .022 | −.033 | .561** | .679** | — |
| (11) Adolescent-reported direct monitoring—12 month | .127 | −.080 | −.202** | .131 | .075 | .060 | .055 | .530** | .573** | .623** |
* = P < .05; **: P < .01; UMP: parent attitudes about the usefulness of the monitoring process; EXP: parent attitudes about the impact of monitoring on adolescent risk behavior and experimentation; ATP: parent attitudes about monitoring and the importance of adolescent trust and privacy.