Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 13;14(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1967

Table 2.

Evaluation of participants’ set of skills when capturing images with the mobile telephone food record.

Skill Adolescents (n = 78) Adults (n = 56)a
Yes,
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Software
errorb,
n (%)
Yes
n (%)
No,
n (%)
Software
error,
n (%)
All foods and beverages included in image
Meal session 1c 61 (78%) 7 (9%) 10 (13%) 53 (95%) 0 (0%) 3 (5%)
Meal session 2 59 (84%) 9 (13%) 2 (3%) 23 (96%) 0 (0%) 1 (4%)
Dessert session 1d NAe NA NA 39 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Dessert session 2d NA NA NA 14 (93%) 0 (0%) 1 (7%)
Entire fiducial marker included in image
Meal session 1 54 (69%) 14 (18%) 10 (13%) 44 (79%) 9 (16%) 3 (5%)
Meal session 2 53 (76%) 15 (21%) 2 (3%) 18 (75%) 5 (21%) 1 (4%)
Dessert session 1d NA NA NA 37 (95%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%)
Dessert session 2d NA NA NA 11 (73%) 3 (20%) 1 (7%)

a Due to software programming error, n = 56 instead of 57.

b Paired images unavailable due to software programming errors.

c P = .008 using chi-square and comparing adolescents versus adults.

d Dessert was served as a separate course for adult participants. For meal session 1, 39 selected dessert, and for meal session 2, 15 selected dessert.

e Not applicable.