Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;14(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1901

Table 6.

Process measures; means (SD) of appreciation of general information intervention and tailored information intervention, self-reported at 1-month post intervention, and t tests for differences between these groups.

Self-reported process measuresa Scale TI
mean (SD)
(n = 162)
GI
mean (SD)
(n = 154)
P values
Amount of information read Nothing (1)-All (5) 4.07 (1.0) 4.5 (0.8) <.001
Length of the texts Much too short (1)-Much too long (5) 3.20 (0.5) 3.07 (0.4) .01
Information meant for me personally Not at all (1)-Very much (5) 3.20 (1.0) 2.83 (1.0) .001
New information Totally disagree (1)-Totally agree (5) 3.11 (1.1) 2.73 (1.1) .003
Useful information Totally disagree (1)-Totally agree (5) 3.48 (0.9) 3.44 (0.9) .68
Attractive design Totally disagree (1)-Totally agree (5) 3.22 (0.9) 3.16 (0.9) .58
Good tool for WGP Totally disagree (1)-Totally agree (5) 2.90 (1.1) 2.75 (1.0) .20
Recommend to others No (1)-Maybe (2)-Yes (3) 2.14 (0.7) 2.14 (0.8) .93
Overall grade Very low (0)-Very high (10) 6.6 (1.4) 6.6 (1.3) .69

a Self-reported at 1-month post-intervention questionnaire, must have used at least the first module