Table 4.
Scenario number | Variable manipulated |
Variable | Number of break-even point(s), up to 60 enrollmentsa |
|||||
Contracted facilitator hours |
Presenter level ($/hour) |
Maximum capacity |
Other fixed costs |
Variable costs |
Enrollment fee (AUD $) |
|||
1b | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 7 | |
2 | Facilitator hours | 8 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 5 |
3 | Facilitator hours | 32 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 11–20, >22 |
4 | Facilitator hours | 40 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 13–20, >27 |
5 | Facilitator hours | 48 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 15–20, 30–40, 45–60 |
6 | Presenter level | 14 | 35 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 5 |
7 | Presenter level | 14 | 90 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 8 |
8 | Presenter level | 14 | 120 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 10 |
9 | Presenter level | 14 | 200 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 15–20, 30–40, 45–60 |
10 | Class capacity | 14 | 60 | 10 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 7 |
11 | Class capacity | 14 | 60 | 30 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 7 |
12 | Class capacity | 14 | 60 | 40 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 7 |
13 | Class capacity | 14 | 60 | 50 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 7 |
14 | Class capacity | 14 | 60 | 60 | 750 | 8 | 250 | 7 |
15 | Fee | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 100 | 17–20, 35–40, 52–60 |
16 | Fee | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 200 | 8 |
17 | Fee | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 400 | 4 |
18 | Fee | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 600 | 3 |
19 | Fee | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 800 | 2 |
20 | Fee | 14 | 60 | 20 | 750 | 8 | 1000 | 2 |
21 | All costs | 100% increase in all associated costs (based on scenario 1) | 250 | 14–20, >28 | ||||
22 | All costs | 200% increase in all associated costs (based on scenario 1) | 250 | Doesn’t break even | ||||
23 | All costs | 300% increase in all associated costs (based on scenario 1) | 250 | Doesn’t break even | ||||
24 | All costs | 50% decrease in all associated costs (based on scenario 1) | 250 | 3 |
a Break-even points are presented as a range when multiple break-even points are relevant to the analysis. Multiple break-even points occur in some of the analyses when the new fixed costs that are incurred when a class reaches its enrollment capacity once again lift the costs above the savings. This relationship is also presented for the face-to-face program in Figure 3.
b Primary analysis scenario.