Table 4.
Program evaluation based on skin cancer history.
| Overall sample | Patients | General Population | Sig.a | ||
| N=387 | N=132 | N=255 | |||
| Advantagesb | |||||
| Personally relevant | 4.11 | 4.37 | 3.98 | <.001 | |
| I agree with the advices | 4.03 | 4.23 | 3.93 | .001 | |
| Credible | 4.36 | 4.49 | 4.29 | .004 | |
| Stimulated to improve sunscreen use behavior | 3.81 | 3.99 | 3.72 | .008 | |
| Well-readable and proper lay-out | 4.16 | 4.29 | 4.09 | .016 | |
| Helped to improve sunscreen use behavior | 3.75 | 3.90 | 3.67 | .027 | |
| Nicely arranged | 4.30 | 4.40 | 4.26 | .060 | |
| Matched my given answers | 3.74 | 3.85 | 3.69 | .101 | |
| Complete | 4.12 | 4.18 | 4.08 | .261 | |
| Informative | 4.19 | 4.22 | 4.18 | .676 | |
| Disadvantagesb | |||||
| Too long | 2.37 | 2.03 | 2.53 | <.001 | |
| Too much information was given | 2.22 | 1.90 | 2.39 | <.001 | |
| Confusing | 2.01 | 1.79 | 2.12 | .001 | |
| Information was missing | 2.36 | 2.26 | 2.41 | .258 | |
| Grade (1-10) | 7.78 | 8.11 | 7.61 | <.001 | |
a Covariates: skin type and frequency in the sun
b 1= totally disagree; 5= totally agree