Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2012 Feb 22;26(3-4):428–461. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.617436

Table 8.

Patient performance on complex and component executive function tasks. Patient and control values show means and ranges (in parentheses). Shading identifies tasks that were combined into composites, as discussed in the Results (see also Table 2).

Complex Executive Function Tasks Patients Controls
 WCST (categories completed) 10 (1-15) 15 (14-15)a
 WCST (perseverative errors) 20 (3-38) 7 (0-21)b
 TOH (number of moves) 95 (60-176) 88 (54-163)b
Simple Executive Function Tasks
Inhibition Tasks
 Verbal Stroop (interference effect,ms) 1017 (131-2794) 244 (56-492)b
 Spatial Stroop (interference effect, ms) 209 (10-865) 63 (−100-260)b
 PWI (interference effect, ms) 199 (−286-676) 38 (−18-185)a
 Recent negatives (interference effect, ms) 664 (−489-2835) 115 (−9-260)a
Updating Tasks
 Verbal 1-back (percent correct) 93 (62-100) 86 (65-97)b, c
 Nonverbal 1-back (percent correct) 82 (52-96) 76 (41-98)b, c
 Verbal keep track (percent correct) 84 (50-100) 93 (79-100)b, c
 Nonverbal keep track (percent correct) 87 (5-100) 89 (51-100)b, c
Shifting Tasks
 Plus-minus (switch cost, sec) 86 (−1-284) 41 (27-74)b, d
 Cued shifting (switch cost, ms) 1033 (19-3197) 155 (−55-468)a
a

Control data collected at Rice University. WCST (categories): N = 18, Mage = 67 years. PWI: N = 9, Mage = 66 years. Recent negatives: N = 10, Mage = 67 years. Cued shifting: N = 16, Mage = 64 years.

b

Control data from Hull et al. (2008).

c

The updating tasks used by Hull et al. (2008) required subjects to update two items (e.g., keeping track of 2 colors in the nonverbal keep track task), as opposed to one item as used for the patients tested in the present study. Thus, the control data reflect 2-item updating; we assume accuracy would be very high were controls to complete the 1-item updating tasks.

d

The plus-minus task used by Hull et al. (2008) required subjects to add or subtract 3 from each two-digit number (as opposed to adding or subtracting 1, as used in the present study). Thus, the control data reflect this task variation.