Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 1;9(19):1–42.

Table 4: Summary of Meta-Analysis of Studies Investigating the Effectiveness of Behavioural Interventions on HbA1c in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Group Estimate of effect
[95% Confidence Interval]
Statistical heterogeneity
(I2)
Overall -0.44 [-0.60, -0.29] 8%
Quality
      High Quality -0.50 [-0.75, -0.26] 40%
      Low Quality -0.37 [-0.62, -0.13] 0%
Intervention length
      Intervention length < 6 weeks -0.42 [-0.68, -0.15] 28%
      Intervention length 6 weeks to 1 year -0.43 [-0.74, -0.12] 47%
      Intervention length = 1 year -0.68 [-1.22, -0.14] 0%
Setting of Care
      Community-based setting -0.48 [-0.70, -0.26] 11%
      Primary Care setting -0.42 [-0.68, -0.15] 28%
Interventionist
      Interventionist < 2 disciplines -0.44 [-0.66, -0.22] 40%
      Interventionist ≥ 2 disciplines -0.51 [-0.84, -0.17] 0%
Baseline HbA1c
      Baseline HbA1c <9.0 -0.40 [-0.55, -0.24] 0%
      Baseline HbA1c ≥9.0 -0.79 [-1.23, -0.34] 0%
Mode of Delivery
      Group sessions -0.47 [-0.66, -0.28] 6%
      Individual sessions* -0.80 [-1.35, -0.25] NA*
      Combined -0.30 [-0.57, -0.02] 0%
Ethnicity
      Hispanic Population -0.42 [-0.71, -0.13] 0%
      Non-Hispanic Population -0.46 [-0.66, -0.25] 25%
*

Based on one study