Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 1;9(23):1–40.

Table 9: Summary of Participant Demographic Characteristics of Included Studies.

Study, N Sex: Female (%) Age (years)* Ethnicity (%) Duration of Diabetes (years)* BMI (kg/m2)* Baseline HbA1c (%)* Baseline SBP (mm Hg)* Total Cholesterol* HDL Cholesterol* Smoker Status (%)
MODEL OF CARE: 1. At least a registered nurse, registered dietician and physician (primary care and/or specialist)
California Medi-Cal Diabetes Study Group, 2004 (14)

N = 335
Intervention: 72.6
Control: 70.9
Intervention: 57.0 ± 0.9
Control: 56.9 ± 1.0
Intervention: African-Am:16.1 Hispanic: 39.2 Caucasian: 34.9 Other: 9.7
Control: African-Am: 15.7 Hispanic: 38.4 Caucasian: 36.0 Other: 9.9
Intervention: 10.3±0.8
Control: 12.0±0.8
Intervention: 33.1±0.8
Control: 31.5±0.8
Mean ± SE: Intervention:9.6±0.1
Control:9.7±0.1
Mean ± SE: Intervention: 136 ± 2
Control: 134 ± 1
Mean ± SE: Intervention: 210.0±3.3 mg/dl
Control: 212.1±3.7 mg/dl
Mean ± SE: Intervention:41.9 ± 1.0 mg/dl
Control:43.0 ± 1.1 mg/dl
Intervention: 14.8
Control: 13.0
Gaede, et al, 2001 (13)

N = 149
NR 55.1 ± 7.2 NR Median (IQR): 6 (4-10) NR Intervention: 8.4±1.5
Control: 8.8±1.7
NR Intervention: 5.4±1.0 mmol/L
Control: 5.8±1.3 mmol/L
Intervention: 1.03±0.2 mmol/L
Control: 1.01±0.3 mmol/L
Intervention: 38.4
Control: 34.2
Groeneveld, et al, 2001 (16)

N = 246
Intervention: 65.9
Control: 53.5
Intervention: 62.7 ± 11
Control: 62.3 ± 10
NR Intervention: 4.1 ± 3.7
Control: 4.6 ± 4.0
NR NA Intervention: 137±27
Control: 149±24
Intervention:6.2 ± 1.2 mmol/L
Control:6.2 ± 1.3 mmol/L
NR NR
Johansen, et al, 2007 (15)

N = 106
Intervention: 28
Control: 23
Intervention: 59 ± 9
Control: 58 ± 11
NR Median (IQR): Intervention: 4 (1-10)
Control: 3 (1-12)
Median (min, max): Intervention: 30.6 (22.6, 484)
Control: 28.6 (16.1, 42.3)
Intervention:7.5± 1.5
Control:7.6± 1.6
Intervention: 136 ± 16
Control: 130 ± 13
Intervention:5.0 ± 1.0 mmol/L
Control:5.0 ± 0.9 mmol/L
Intervention:1.3 ± 0.4 mmol/L
Control:1.3 ± 0.4 mmol/L
Intervention: 8
Control: 15
Maislos, et al, 2004 (12)

N = 82
Intervention: 50
Control: 65
Intervention: 58 ± 14
Control: 63 ± 9
NR NR Intervention: 30.8 ± 3.6
Control: 30.8 ± 3.0
Intervention: 12.9 ± 3.4
Control: 12.6 ± 2.9
NR NR NR NR
Choe, et al, 2005 (22)

N = 80
Intervention: 51.2
Control: 53.9
Intervention: 52.2 ± 11.2
Control: 51.0 ± 9.0
Intervention: African-Am: 17.1 Caucasian: 80.5 Other: 2.4
Control: African-Am: 12.8 Caucasian: 71.8 Other: 5.1 Unknown: 10.3
NR NR Intervention:10.1± 1.8
Control:10.2± 1.7
NR NR NR NR
McLean, et al, 2008 (18)

N = 227
Intervention: 34.8
Control: 65.5
Intervention: 66.2 ± 11.3
Control: 63.7 ± 12.7
NR NR Intervention: 31.7 ± 6.0
Control: 31.6 ± 7.9
NR Intervention: 142.5 ± 15.5
Control: 139.9 ± 11.9
NR NR Intervention: 9.6
Control: 10.77
Rothman, et al, 2005 (17)

N = 217
Intervention: 56
Control: 56
Intervention: 54 ± 13
Control: 57 ± 11
Intervention: African-Am: 70
Control: African-Am: 59
Intervention:8 ± 9
Control: 9 ± 9
Intervention: 35 ± 9
Control: 34 ± 8
Intervention: 10.8 ± 2.1
Control: 10.7 ± 2.5
Intervention: 141.2 ± 21.8
Control: 137.4 ± 21.2
Intervention:217.0± 86.5 mg/dl
Control:207.1± 64.1 mg/dl
NR NR
*

All values summarized as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified