Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 1;8(3):1–52.

Table 7: Existing Systematic Reviews on Patient-Directed Behavioural Techniques for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence*.

Systematic Review, Year Intervention Number of Studies Included in Review Results and Conclusions Comments
Wallace et al., 2004

Updated in 2006

Cochrane review (29)
Bladder training 12 studies; 8 studies provided usable data Clear conclusions regarding the effectiveness of bladder training are difficult to make based on the limited evidence available.

Compared with no bladder training, point estimates of effect favoured bladder training; however, CI were wide and no statistically significant differences were found.
Not limited to seniors Only 2 of 12 studies where majority of population >65 y
Teunissen et al., 2004 (38) Behavioural therapy and drug therapy in community-based seniors 4 before-after studies 4 RCTs Behaviour therapy, including PFMT, is effective in reducing urinary leakage (5 studies).

Behaviour therapy appears more effective than drug therapy in seniors (3 studies).

There is insufficient high-quality evidence to make conclusions regarding drug therapy in seniors.
Not limited to RCT evidence
Choi et al., 2007 (30) PFMT versus no treatment 12 studies Studies heterogeneous in terms of types of incontinence, eligible ages, duration of PFMT.

PFMT is effective in reducing
  • Incontinent episodes (MWES −0.68; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.46);

  • Urine leakage amount (MWES −1.48; 95% CI, −2.58 to −0.38); and

  • Perceived severity (NS) (MWES −1.66; 95% CI, −3.59 to 0.27).

Only 5 of 12 studies where majority of population >65 y

Included studies with multicomponent behavioural interventions and not just PFMT alone
Hay-Smith et al., 2006

Cochrane review (31)
PFMT alone versus no treatment 13 studies; 6 studies contributed data to the analysis Considerable variation among studies in inclusion criteria, interventions and outcome measures
  • Patient perceived cure more likely after PFMT than control

  • Fewer incontinent episodes with PFMT than control

  • May be improved condition-specific quality of life with PFMT compared with control

  • Treatment adherence likely to impact size and direction of treatment effect, but difficult to measure

  • No serious adverse effects reported Final conclusion: PFMT is better than no treatment for women with stress, urge, or mixed UI.

Excluded trials where PFMT was combined with another conservative therapy (to be examined in future reviews)

Only 3 of 13 studies where majority of population >65 y

Did not pool estimates of effect
*

CI refers to confidence interval(s); MWES, mean weighted effect size; NS, not significant; PFMT, pelvic floor muscle training; RCT, randomized controlled trial; UI, urinary incontinence.