Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 1;11(1):1–93.

Table 12B. GRADE Level of Evidence for Endovascular RFA versus Laser Ablation for Varicose Veins.

Outcome Study Design Quality (Consort) Consistency Effects Directness and generalizability Summary Study Findings Overall Quality
Pain and Recovery 2 RCT 1 CCT High Consistent reports Appropriate range of patients, both interventions performed in outpatient setting with local anaesthesia and with recovery to both usual activity and return to work Pain and bruising was significantly lower after RFA up to 2 weeks but not at one month or when pain was corrected for analgesic use. Recovery was comparable in the two groups. Moderate
Vein occlusion or obliteration 1 RCT 3 CCT Low Inconsistent reporting and variable study designs RCT involved cases of bilateral VV limiting generalizability and the CCT studies compared ablation techniques under vein restrictions applicable to RFA but not to ELT. Ablation rates in the RCT and controlled clinical trials resulted in conflicting results Low
Vein Symptom Relief 2 RCT High Consistent reports Appropriate range patients with reliable and valid assessment but short term evaluation limits interpretation of treatment effectiveness Vein symptom relief was significantly improved over baseline in both treatment groups but was higher after RFA than ELT at 2 weeks but not at I month. Moderate
HRQOL 2 RCT High Consistent reports Appropriate range patients with reliable and valid assessment but timing of assessment early post-operatively limits validity Significant improvement in vein specific QOL were reported in both endovascular groups with no between group differences Low
Recurrence 1 RCT 3 CCT Low Limited and variable reporting RCT involved cases of bilateral VV limiting generalizability and the CCT studies compared ablation techniques under vein restrictions applicable to RFA but not to ELT. Ablation rates in the controlled clinical trials resulted in conflicting results Low
Patient satisfaction NR NR NR NR NR NR

HRQOL; health related quality of life, NR, not reported; RCT; randomized controlled trial